|
|
|
PSYCHOLOGICAL AVOIDANCE OR DESTRUCTION OF
COMMITMENT
- Thursday, December 21, '00 - Parshas Vayeishev 5761 |
In this series we have talked about
many issues central to effectively finding a mate who one may reasonably expect to keep.
We've discussed how to break the ice and meaningfully meet, what goes into compatibility,
how to check a person out, how to tell who the "right one is," how to
halachically seek or give information and how to tell if your judgement is reliable. This
is all empty unless both parties are equipped for a happy relationship and a lasting
commitment. A major problem in today's "singles situation" is that many young
people are not psychologically equipped for a stable, intimate and committed marriage
relationship. There are many causes and manifestations of this and they each generally
require considerable serious and sustained counseling to remedy. Since many people enter
into marriages in which one or both partners may not be equipped to give the relationship
they promise to the other, I will write two installments about representative
psychological conditions which can interfere with the entering into, sustaining or
succeeding in a marriage relationship.
If the single saw a bad marriage in his/her parents (e.g. anger, violence, fighting,
strife, divorce, spite, confrontation, domineerance, infidelity, abandonment or
punitiveness); this puts into the single's mind frightening associations and thoughts that
marriage will automatically cause anxiety, pain, shortchange or failure. The person may
not be consciously aware of this fear of commitment, and may even feel a longing to be
married, but that fear will work powerfully upon the mind and behavior of the single. If a
parent was a survivor of and traumatized by the holocaust, or was emotionally abused or
neglected by his/her parents, a pattern of emotionally injurious behavior may exist in
that family. A professional exploration may reveal psychological and behavioral
similarities or linkages between the single, one or both of his/her parent(s) and/or
relating partners.
If one or both of the parents were hurtful to the single as a child, a fear of
vulnerability or entrapment can develop. If a parent was domineering, stifling, cold,
aloof, emotionally or physically unavailable, critical, abusive, punitive, exploitive or
demanding; such becomes generalized and associated in the young person's mind with all
close relating, never mind when "stuck" in a commitment. The single may not have
been emotionally nurtured; may be untrusting of having another's approval, love,
understanding, appreciation, compassion, respect or commitment. Closeness may be
unmanageably frightening and threatening. A person may mistreat or avoid others to keep
them distant. A woman, desperate for feeling loved or approved of, may be promiscuous. A
man or woman with a broken self-image may do unreasonable, excessive or self-deprecating
kindnesses and favors (at unhealthy levels) or allow him/herself to be used like a
"shmata (rag)" for the approval or acceptance of others, in or out of a close
relationship. But, it is never real or close relating.
A dysfunctional background affects what a person is attracted to and how one chooses
and disqualifies partners. On a deep subconscious level, relationships must always fit
into the person's emotional needs and conditions, and into the mold of the person's inner
psychological situation. The person develops "antenna" for partners who feed
into neurotic needs and patterns. The person may have an intellectual list of ideals to
look for, but the person is motivated and driven on the emotional level and pursues
relationships which hit the emotional "hot buttons." The ideal "list"
is abstract and meaningless. THE ISSUE IS NOT LOGICAL, IT IS PSYCHOLOGICAL.
The person can engage in self-defeating and self-sabotaging patterns in relationship
after relationship, repeating the same basic problems and patterns. An intense emotional
and committed relationship can be frightening under the best conditions; all the moreso
with complex and unhealthy issues in one or, very often, both partners. Marriage requires
enormous maturity, responsibility, unselfishness, humility, flexibility, giving,
discipline, sacrifice and will power. BEING LONELY OR SENTIMENTAL IS NOT SYNONYMOUS WITH
BEING READY TO GET MARRIED. Two incomplete halves cannot add up to a complete whole. ONLY
TWO REASONABLY COMPLETE HALVES CAN ADD UP TO A COMPLETE WHOLE (even though imperfect, they
both must at least be functional and non-harmful). Both partners must be in, what I call,
the "FUNCTION-LEVEL BALLPARK." Being emotionally scarred from childhood or a
terrible previous marriage can severely impact subsequent marriage.
If a pattern occurs time after time, it always does not work, it is "always the
other's fault" and you are repeatedly attracted to the same pattern or type of
person; then there is a contradiction between what you want and the fact that it does not
work. Generally, this requires considerable work and unraveling with professional
counseling for this to be resolved and for life to "get on the right track."
If a relationship drags on for more than a few months and does not escalate to
marriage, or it escalates to marriage and then becomes stormy, my counseling experience
shows that often something intrinsic and fundamental is missing. Both have some profound
and unhealthy need, dependency and/or lacking. The relationship offers something that the
parties would like to have received from one or both parents in childhood, which affected
the single with deep emotional and mental impact. The relationship provided some form of
needed emotional comfort, convenience, relief, sensation or (imagined) safety. Ironically,
when very neurotic, such a poisonous relationship is often hard to break. As it gets
worse, there is more intensity, sabotage, provocation, blaming, punishing, hurt,
instability and fighting. Both might be surprised that something that was once so
beautiful degenerated to such a low point. But the trouble was there from "day
one," if not childhood. These are types of troubles which need objective and
professional exploration to obtain resolution.
Never marry someone on the basis of expecting or demanding psychological or religious
change. The person may not change, may revert back or may change in ways you never
anticipated. My advise is to gently but firmly say, "I am seeking a relationship with
this (psychological or religious) characteristic. If you change yourself, and this can be
validated by your (counselor or rabbi) and I am still single then, you may contact me in
your changed form in the future. Barring that, we must be through." |