POINT BY POINT SUMMARY
Prepared by P. Feldman of Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
Ask A Question on the daf
Previous daf
Yevamos 98
YEVAMOS 98 (30 Adar!) - dedicated by Rabbi Dr. Eli Turkel of
Raanana, Israel. May all the members of his family be blessed
with Simcha and fulfillment, throughout their lives!
|
1) ARE CONVERTS PERMITTED TO THEIR RELATIVES?
(a) Rejection: No, there is not even a prohibition; since the
end of the Mishnah says, they are liable, the beginning
said, they are not liable.
(b) (Rava): This that people say, legally, a Mitzri has no
father - do not say, this is because they have relations
wantonly, and we do not know who the father is, but if we
did know, we would be concerned.
1. Rather, even when we know, we are not concerned -
for twins come from the same drop of semen, it just
got split into 2, and the Beraisa teaches, they do
not do Chalitzah or Yibum!
2. Rather, the Torah considers the child to have no
father - "Their flesh is flesh of donkeys, and their
seed is as that of horses".
(c) (R. Yosi): There was a case of Niftaim the convert, who
married the wife of his maternal brother. Chachamim said,
there is no law of marriage regarding a convert.
(d) Objection: If he engaged a woman it does not take
effect?!
(e) Correction: Rather, there is no prohibition of a
brother's wife by a convert.
1. Suggestion: Isn't it the case, she had married the
1st brother after conversion?
2. Rejection: No, before conversion.
3. Objection: If so, obviously she is permitted!
4. Answer: One might have thought, we decree on account
of the case when he married her after conversion -
we hear, this is not so.
(f) (Beraisa - Ben Yosyan): Overseas, I saw a convert that
married his maternal brother's wife. I asked, who
permitted her to you? He said, 'Here are a woman and her
7 children that were permitted. R. Akiva sat on this rock
and said 2 things'.
1. A convert may marry the wife of his maternal
brother.
2. "Hash-m's word to Yonah, the 2nd time" - he did not
speak to him a 3rd time.
(g) Suggestion: The Beraisa permits the wife of a maternal
brother - this is one he married after conversion.
1. Rejection: No, before conversion.
2. Objection: If so, obviously she is permitted!
3. Answer: One might have thought, we decree on account
of the case when he married her after conversion -
we hear, this is not so.
(h) Question: Is the convert really believed to say that R.
Akiva permitted this?
1. (Rav Yehudah): A Chacham that says a teaching - if
he said it before the case arose, he is believed; if
not, we do not accept the teaching.
(i) Answer #1: This case was, he had already said the
teaching.
(j) Answer #2: Here he was believed, because the woman and
her 7 children had already been permitted.
(k) Answer #3: Here he was believed, since he said another
teaching with it.
(l) (Beraisa): "Hash-m's word to Yonah, the 2nd time" - he
did not speak to him a 3rd time.
(m) Question: But it says, "... as the word Hash-m spoke
through Yonah"!
(n) Answer #1 (Ravina): He only spoke twice with him
regarding Ninveh.
(o) Answer #2 (Rav Nachman Bar Yitzchak): "As the word Hash-m
spoke through Yonah" - just as Ninveh was reversed from
evil to good, also in the days of Yerovom Ben Yoash,
Yisrael reversed from evil to good.
2) RELATIVES PERMITTED TO A CONVERT
(a) (Beraisa): A convert that was born after his mother
converted, but was conceived before conversion, he is
forbidden to maternal relatives, but not to paternal
relatives.
1. If he married his maternal sister, he must divorce
her; his paternal sister, they may stay married;
2. If he married his father's maternal sister, he must
divorce her; his father's paternal sister, they may
stay married;
98b---------------------------------------98b
3. If he married his mother's maternal sister, he must
divorce her; his mother's paternal sister - R. Meir
says, he must divorce her; Chachamim say, they may
stay married.
i. R. Meir says, any relative on the mother's
side, he must divorce her; on the father's
side, they may stay married.
4. He is permitted to the wife of his maternal brother,
and the wife of his father's brother; all other
Arayos are permitted to him, to include his father's
wife.
5. If he married a woman and her daughter, he has
Nisu'in with one, and divorces the other;
l'Chatchilah, he should not do Nisu'in.
6. If his wife dies, he is permitted to his
mother-in-law; some teach, he is forbidden to her.
(b) Suggestion: The Beraisa permits the wife of his brother -
this is one he married after conversion.
1. Rejection: No, before conversion.
2. Objection: If so, obviously she is permitted!
3. Answer: One might have thought, we decree on account
of the case when he married her after conversion -
we hear, this is not so.
(c) Question: The Beraisa says, 'If he married a woman and
her daughter, he has Nisu'in with one, and divorces the
other; l'Chatchilah, he should not do Nisu'in' - if he
must divorce her, of course, l'Chatchilah he may not do
Nisu'in!
(d) Answer: This refers to the cases where Chachamim say he
may stay married - l'Chatchilah, he should not do
Nisu'in.
(e) (Beraisa): If his wife dies, he is permitted to his
mother-in-law; some teach, he is forbidden to her.
1. The latter opinion is as R. Yishmael; the former, as
R. Akiva.
i. The latter is as R. Yishmael, who says that a
mother-in-law after the wife dies is forbidden
as before; by a convert, we decreed;
ii. The former opinion is as R. Akiva, who says
that the prohibition of a mother-in-law becomes
lighter after the wife dies - by a convert,
Chachamim did not decree.
3) CHILDREN THAT GOT MIXED UP
(a) (Mishnah): The children of 5 women got mixed up. These
children grew up and married women. One of the men died
without children. We have a 5-way doubt who his father
was - a (certain) son from each of 4 of the 5 possible
fathers does Chalitzah, and a son of 1 possible father
may do Yibum.
(b) If another of the mixed-up men died, the man that did
Yibum and sons from 3 other fathers do Chalitzah, and a
son from 1 father does Yibum;
(c) Anytime a man of the mixture dies, his widow receives
Chalitzah from 4 men and may do Yibum.
(d) (Gemara): The Chalitzos must be done before Yibum, lest
her husband was from a different father, and the 'Yibum'
is really a Shomeres Yavam (improperly) marrying a man
that is not her Yavam.
(e) Question: Why must the man that did the 1st Yibum do
Chalitzah to another Shomeres Yavam - he should be
allowed to do Yibum!
(f) Answer: We do not want 1 man to do Yibum to all of them -
rather, 1 man from each father does 1 Yibum, perhaps each
Yevamah will get her true Yavam.
(g) (Beraisa): Some of them (have) brothers, some (have) no
brothers - the brothers do Chalitzah, those without
brothers do Yibum.
(h) Question: What does this mean?
(i) Answer (Rav Safra): If some of the mixed-up men have
paternal brothers, and some have maternal brothers, the
maternal brothers do Chalitzah, the paternal brothers do
Yibum.
(j) (Beraisa): If some of the brothers are Kohanim, and
others are not, the Kohanim do Chalitzah, the others do
Yibum;
(k) If some of the brothers are Kohanim, and others are
maternal brothers, both do Chalitzah, not Yibum.
Next daf
|