POINT BY POINT SUMMARY
Prepared by P. Feldman of Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
Ask A Question on the daf
Previous daf
Yevamos 97
YEVAMOS 96, 97 - These Dafim have been sponsored through the
generous donation of Reb Uri Wolfson of Yerushalayim, a true
Ohev Torah.
|
1) TORAH SAID IN A CHACHAM'S NAME
(a) (R. Yochanan): Any Chachamim whose teaching people recite
in this world, his lips move in the grave.
(b) (R. Yitzchak Ben Ze'iri): He learns this from "Your
palate is as the good wine, it agitates the lips of the
sleeping as a pile of grapes".
1. A pile of grapes, once you put your finger on it, it
moves; also Chachamim, once people say teachings in
their names in this world, their lips move in the
grave.
2) THE AGE OF ADULTHOOD
(a) (Mishnah): A 9 year old is as (a 20 year old that did not
bring hairs).
(b) Contradiction (Mishnah): A 20 year old man that did not
bring 2 hairs, they bring a proof that he is 20 and he is
a Seris, he does not do Chalitzah or Yibum; a 20 year old
woman that did not bring 2 hairs, they bring a proof that
she is 20 and she is an Ailonis, she does not do
Chalitzah or Yibum.
(c) Answer: Rav said, that Mishnah applies when he brought
signs of being a Seris.
1. (Rava): The language if the Mishnah proves this - it
says, 'And he is a Seris'.
(d) Question: If he does not have signs of being a Seris,
when does he become an adult?
(e) (Tana d'Vei R. Chiya): Until the majority of his years
(35).
(f) When people that had not brought hairs would come before
Rava, if he was weak, he would tell them to make him
healthy; if he was well fed, he would tell them to thin
him out.
1. Sometimes signs fall out because of weakness;
sometimes, because of being overweight.
***** PEREK NOSE'IN AL HA'ANUSAH *****
3) RELATIVES ARE ONLY FORBIDDEN BY ENGAGEMENT
(a) (Mishnah): One may marry the relatives of a woman he
raped or enticed; one who rapes or entices the relative
of his wife is liable (to Kares);
(b) A man may marry the woman raped or enticed by his father
or son; R. Yehudah forbids the woman raped or enticed by
his father.
(c) (Gemara): Our Mishnah teaches as the following Beraisa.
1. (Beraisa): If a man raped a woman, he may marry her
daughter; if he married a woman, he is forbidden to
marry her daughter.
(d) Contradiction (Beraisa): One who is suspected of
relations with a woman is forbidden to her mother,
daughter and sister.
(e) Answer: That prohibition is only mid'Rabanan.
(f) Question: Wherever there is a Rabbinical prohibition, the
Tana says we may marry, Lechatchilah?!
(g) Answer: Our Mishnah deals after the woman he was
suspected of died - then there is not even a Rabbinical
prohibition.
(h) Question: What is the source that a man may marry the
relatives of a woman he raped or enticed?
(i) Answer #1 (Beraisa): By all Arayos, it says "Lying"; by
the forbidden relatives of one's wife, it says "Taking",
to teach that the prohibition only applies through taking
(marriage).
1. Question (Rav Papa): If so, regarding one's sister,
it says "That will take his sister..." - is the
prohibition only through marriage, but intercourse
without engagement is permitted?!
2. Answer (Abaye): The Torah says "Taking" without
specifying. When it can apply to engagement, it
does; when it applies to intercourse, it means
intercourse.
(j) Answer #2 (Rava): The following teaches that if a man
raped a woman, he can marry her daughter.
1. "The Ervah of your son's or daughter's daughter, do
not reveal" - this implies, her granddaughters
(i.e. of the mother of your children) are permitted!
2. Contradiction: It also says, "The Ervah of a woman
and her daughter, do not reveal, do not take the
daughter of her son or daughter"!
3. Resolution (Rava): The 1st verse refers to rape; the
2nd verse, to marriage.
4. Question: Why not say the opposite way?
5. Answer: By Arayos, it says Sher (closeness) - Sher
is through marriage, not through rape.
(k) (Mishnah): R. Yehudah prohibits a man to the woman his
father raped.
(l) (Rav Gidal): R. Yehudah learns from "A man will not take
his father's wife, nor will he reveal the wing of his
father" - a wing that his father saw, the son will not
reveal.
(m) Question: How do we know it refers to a woman he raped?
(n) Answer: From the previous passage - "The man that lied
with (raped) her ...".
1. Chachamim: If this was immediately before it, we
would agree; since they are not adjacent, we expound
the verse as Rav Anan.
2. (Rav Anan): The verse refers to the Shomeres Yavam
of his father.
i. "The wing of his father" means, a wing fit for
his father.
3. Question: She is already forbidden to the son - it
is his uncle's wife!
4. Answer: The verse adds a 2nd Lav for relations with
her.
5. Question: She is already forbidden twice - she is a
Shomeres Yavam!
6. Answer #1: The verse adds a 3rd Lav.
7. Answer #2 : After all the Yevamim die, there is no
prohibition of a Shomeres Yavam, so this verse adds
a 2nd prohibition.
97b---------------------------------------97b
4) RIDDLES
(a) 'He is a paternal but not maternal brother, and he is my
mother's husband, and I am the daughter of his wife'
(i.e. the girl speaking was born out of wedlock; her
paternal brother married her mother).
1. (Rami Bar Chama): This is unlike R. Yehudah, who
forbids a man to marry a woman his father raped.
(b) 'He is my brother, and my son; I am the sister of the one
I carry on my shoulder'.
1. This arises by a Nochri that has intercourse with
his daughter.
(c) 'Shalom to you, my son; I am the daughter of your
sister'.
1. This arises by a Nochri that has intercourse with
his daughter's daughter.
(d) This riddle was asked to water carriers - 'The one I
carry is my son, and I am the daughter of his brother.'
1. This arises by a Nochri that has intercourse with
his son's daughter.
(e) 'Alas, my brother, and he is my father, and my husband,
and the son of my husband, and the husband of my mother,
and I am the daughter of his wife, and he does not give
bread to his brethren, the orphan children of his
daughter.
1. This arises by a Nachri that fathered a girl through
his mother, and then he had intercourse with the
daughter; then his father had children through her.
(f) 'I and you are brothers; I and your father are brothers;
I and your mother are brothers.
1. This arises by a Nochri that has intercourse with
his mother and had 2 daughters, and then intercourse
with one of them and had a son.
i. The sister of his mother says to him, we are
siblings; I and your father are siblings; I and
your mother are sisters.
2. This can also arise in a permitted way - Reuven has
2 daughters; Shimon married one of them, Levi's son
married the other, and Shimon's son says thusly to
the son of Levi's son.
5) RELATIONS BETWEEN CONVERTS
(a) (Mishnah): A woman's sons converted with her. Her sons do
not do Yibum or Chalitzah to each other's wives, even if
the 1st son was conceived before conversion and born
after conversion, and the 2nd was conceived and born
after conversion;
(b) The same applies to a slave whose sons were freed with
her.
(c) (Gemara): The children of the slave Yudan were freed. Rav
Acha Bar Yakov permitted them to marry each other's
wives.
(d) Objection (Rava): But Rav Sheshes forbade this!
1. Rav Acha Bar Yakov: He forbade, and I permit!
(e) Version #1: If they are paternal but not maternal
brothers, all agree that they are permitted.
1. If they are maternal but not paternal brothers, all
agree that they are forbidden.
2. They argue by brothers from the mother and father.
i. Rav Acha Bar Yakov permits, since people view
them as paternal brothers - they call them, the
sons of Ploni.
ii. Rav Sheshes forbids - people also call them the
sons of Plonis (their mother).
(f) Version #2: Rav Acha Bar Yakov permits in all cases, even
when they are only maternal brothers.
1. Question: Why?
2. Answer: A convert is as a newborn baby.
(g) (Mishnah): A woman whose sons converted with her - they
do not do Yibum or Chalitzah to each other's wives.
1. Suggestion: They do not do Yibum because it is
forbidden!
2. Rejection: No, rather because Chalitzah and Yibum do
not apply - their widows are free to marry
strangers, or the brother.
3. Objection: But the Mishnah says 'Even (if the 1st
son was conceived before conversion...)'!
i. Version #1: We understand if each man is
forbidden to his brother's wife - the Mishnah
says, 'Even if the 1st son was conceived before
conversion and born after conversion, and the
2nd was conceived and born after conversion',
and it is as if they have different mothers,
still they are forbidden.
ii. Question: If each man is permitted to his
brother's wife why does the Mishnah say
'Even...'?
iii. Answer: Even though both were born after
conversion, and people might confuse them with
Yisraelim, we permit them to each other's
wives.
iv. Version #2: We understand if each man is
permitted to his brother's wife - the Mishnah
says, even though both were born after
conversion, and people might confuse them with
Yisraelim, still we permit them to each other's
wives.
v. Question: If each man is forbidden to his
brother's wife why does the Mishnah say
'Even...'?
vi. Answer: Even though the 1st son was conceived
before conversion and born after conversion,
and the 2nd was conceived and born after
conversion, and it is as if they have different
mothers, still they are forbidden.
(h) (Beraisa): 2 twins that converted or were freed do not do
Chalitzah or Yibum to each other's wives, and they are
not liable for marrying each other's wife;
(i) If they were conceived before conversion and born after
conversion, they do not do Chalitzah or Yibum but they
are liable for marrying each other's wife;
(j) If they were conceived and born after conversion, they
are as Yisraelim in all respects.
1. Suggestion: The 1st clause teaches, they are not
liable for marrying each other's wife - implying,
there is no punishment, but it is forbidden!
Next daf
|