POINT BY POINT SUMMARY
Prepared by Rabbi P. Feldman of Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
Ask A Question on the daf
Previous daf
Shevuos 10
SHEVUOS 6-10 - Ari Kornfeld has generously sponsored the Dafyomi
publications for these Dafim for the benefit of Klal Yisrael.
|
1) GOATS OFFERED ON THE FESTIVALS
(a) Question: What is R. Shimon's source that goats of the
festivals atone for (Tum'ah of the Mikdash or Kodshim)
that was not known at the beginning nor at the end?
(b) Answer: He learns as R. Chama b'Rebbi Chanina taught.
1. (R. Chama b'Rebbi Chanina): By the goat of festivals
it says "U'S'ir" - the extra 'Vov' equates it to the
previous matter (the goat of Rosh Chodesh).
2. Just as the goat of Rosh Chodesh atones for a matter
of Kodshim, also the goats of the festivals.
(c) Suggestion: Perhaps they should atone for the same thing
as the goat of Rosh Chodesh!
(d) Rejection: By the goat of Rosh Chodesh it says "Osah" -
only the goat bears this sin.
(e) Suggestion: Perhaps they should atone for the same thing
as the outer goat of Yom Kipur!
(f) Rejection: "Achas b'Shanah" - we learn that the atonement
of the outer goat only comes once a year.
(g) Question: The Chata'im it atones for - what knowledge was
there?
1. If he knew at the beginning and at the end - he must
bring a sacrifice!
2. If he knew at the beginning but not at the end - the
inner goat and Yom Kipur suspend punishment for
this!
3. If he knew at the end but not at the beginning - the
outer goat and Yom Kipur atone for this!
(h) Answer: We must say, he did not know at the beginning nor
at the end.
2) R. MEIR'S OPINION
(a) (Mishnah): R. Meir says, all the goats (of Rosh Chodesh,
the festivals and Yom Kipur) atone for the same things (a
Tamei person who entered the Mikdash or ate Kodshim, or a
Tahor person who ate Tamei Kodshim)
(b) Question (R. Chama b'Rebbi Chanina): What is R. Meir's
reason?
(c) Answer #1 (R. Chama): By goats of the festivals it says
"U'S'ir" - the extra 'Vov' equates the law to the
previous matter.
1. We are thinking that each is learned from the
previous one.
2. Question: R. Yochanan taught, a general rule of
expounding is that a matter learned from something
else can teach about something else, in all areas of
Torah except Kodshim!
3. Answer: Rather, everything is learned from one
source (e.g. each festival is learned from Rosh
Chodesh,...)
(d) Objection: By Shavu'os and Yom Kipur it says "Se'ir", not
'U'S'ir' - how can we learn these?
(e) Answer #2 (R. Yonah): Rather, "Eleh Ta'asu la'Shem
b'Mo'adeichem" - this equates all the Mo'adim.
(f) Question: But Rosh Chodesh is not a Mo'ed!
(g) Answer: Indeed, a verse calls it Mo'ed!
1. (Abaye): "Kara Alai Mo'ed" - Tamuz (when the
Meraglim toured Eretz Yisrael) was a full month of
30 days, causing that they returned before the eve
of the ninth of Av.
(h) (R. Yochanan): R. Meir admits that the inner goat of Yom
Kipur does not atone for what these goats atone for, and
vice-versa.
1. The inner goat of Yom Kipur does not atone for what
the others do - "V'Chiper...Achas", it makes only
one atonement;
2. The others do not atone for what the inner goat
atones for - "Achas b'Shanah" - the atonement of the
inner goat only comes once a year.
(i) Support (Beraisa - R. Meir): The goats of Rosh Chodesh,
the festivals and the outer goat of Yom Kipur atone for a
Tamei person who entered the Mikdash or ate Kodshim if he
did not know at the beginning (whether or not he later
found out), and for a Tahor person who ate Tamei Kodshim;
1. The Beraisa omits the inner goat, and what it atones
for (if he knew at the beginning but not at the
end).
3) R. SHIMON'S OPINION
(a) (Mishnah - R. Shimon): The goat of Rosh Chodesh atones
for a Tahor person who ate Tamei Kodshim...
(b) We understand why it does not atone for what the goats of
the festivals atone for - "Avon (singular)" - the goat
only bears one sin, not two.
(c) Question: Why don't the goats of the festivals atone for
what the goat of Rosh Chodesh atones for!
(d) Answer: By the goat of Rosh Chodesh it says "Osah (it)" -
only the goat bears this sin.
(e) We understand why the goats of the festivals do not atone
for what the outer goat of Yom Kipur atones for - "Achas
b'Shanah" - the atonement only comes once a year.
(f) Question: Why doesn't the outer goat atone for what the
goats of the festivals do?
(g) Answer: "V'Chiper...Achas", it makes only one atonement.
(h) Question: That verse is written by the inner goat!
(i) Answer: "Milvad Chatas ha'Kipurim" - this equates the
inner and outer goats.
10b---------------------------------------10b
(j) (R. Shimon ben Yehudah citing R. Shimon): (The goats of
Rosh Chodesh atone for a Tahor person who ate Tamei
Kodshim; the goats of the festivals atone for this, and
also for Tum'ah (of the Mikdash or Kodshim) which was
never known; the outer goat atones for both of these, and
also for Tum'ah which only known at the end.)
(k) Question: Presumably, he learns that the goat of Rosh
Chodesh does not make the atonement of the goats of the
festivals from "Avon" - the goat only bears one sin, not
two;
1. He should likewise say that the goats of the
festivals do not atone for what the goat of Rosh
Chodesh atones for - "Osah" - only the goat bears
this sin!
(l) Answer: He does not expound "Osah" thusly.
(m) Question: Presumably, he learns that the goats of the
festivals do not make the atonement of the outer goat
from "Achas b'Shanah" - the atonement only comes once a
year.
1. He should likewise say that the outer goat does not
atone for what the goats of the festivals do -
"V'Chiper...Achas", it makes only one atonement!
(n) Answer #1: He does not expound "V'Chiper...Achas" thusly.
(o) Question: Presumably, this is because that verse is
written by the inner goat;
1. Also "Achas b'Shanah" is written by the inner goat,
yet he applies it to the outer goat!
(p) Answer: Really, he expounds "V'Chiper...Achas";
1. Since it says "V'Chiper...Al Karnosav Achas", this
teaches that the atonement on its (the inner
Altar's) corners only makes one atonement, but the
atonement on the outer Altar makes more than one
atonement.
4) DOES "KEDUSHAH" VANISH?
(a) (Ula): Unblemished lambs for the Tamid (daily offering)
that were not used by Nisan (and now communal sacrifices
must be bought from Shekalim of the new year) may be
redeemed.
(b) Question (Rav Chisda): Did the Kedushah vanish (that they
can be redeemed unblemished)?!
1. Counter-question (Rabah): How can you argue - a
Mishnah teaches this!
i. (Mishnah): Extra incense (that was not used by
Nisan), we redeem it on money owed to those who
made it, we give it to the workers, and buy it
back from the new Shekalim.
2. Answer (Rav Chisda): Incense only has monetary
Kedushah, therefore its Kedushah vanishes.
Next daf
|