THOUGHTS ON THE DAILY DAF
brought to you by Kollel Iyun Hadaf of Har Nof
Rosh Kollel: Rav Mordecai Kornfeld
Ask A Question about the Daf
Previous daf
Eruvin 39
ERUVIN 38 & 39 - sponsored by a generous grant from an anonymous donor. Kollel Iyun Hadaf is indebted to him for his encouragement and support and prays that Hashem will repay him in kind.
|
39b
1) HALACHAH: A FRUIT PICKED ON THE FIRST DAY OF YOM TOV
QUESTION: The Gemara concludes that an animal that was captured by a
gentile on the first day of Yom Tov may be eaten on the second day of Yom
Tov. Normally, when a Melachah is done by a gentile for a Jew on Shabbos,
a Jew may not benefit from that Melachah until enough time has elapsed
after Shabbos for the Jew to have done the Melachah himself. What is the
Halachah, though, when a Melachah was done on the first of two days of Yom
Tov Shel Galuyos (i.e., outside of Israel, when only one of the days is
actually Yom Tov)? This question may be divided into two parts:
If a non-Jew picked a fruit on the first day of Yom Tov, when may a Jew
eat it -- that day, that night, or the following night (after the second
day of Yom Tov? May a Jew other than the one for whom the non-Jew picked
the fruit eat it at an earlier time?
ANSWERS:
(a) ON THE DAY IT WAS PICKED: The Gemara states that if we have reason to
suspect that a non-Jew picked fruit on Yom Tov for a Jew to eat, then that
fruit is forbidden for Jewish consumption for all that day, and it is
forbidden after the day is over until after the time that would take to
prepare the fruit has passed (this "preparation time" is defined as the
time it would take to pick the fruit, plus the time that it took the non-
Jew to transport the fruit from the place of harvest to the home of the
Jew by whatever means of transport the non-Jew used; Shulchan Aruch OC
515:1).
The fruit is forbidden *on that day* for *two* reasons: (1) Since the
fruit was attached to the tree when Yom Tov began and was thus
inaccessible, it is Muktzah. (2) There is a decree of "Peiros ha'Noshrim"
which forbids the use of fruit which fell from the tree on Shabbos. The
Rabanan made such a decree out of concern that one might pick fruit from
the tree on Shabbos. If it is a two day Yom Tov, the fruit is not Muktzah
on the second day.
(b) ON THE FOLLOWING DAY: The reason for the prohibition *after* Yom Tov
is the subject of dispute among the Rishonim. Two different approaches are
suggested by the Rishonim:
(1) RASHI (DH Lo Teima Lehu), RAMBAN, RASHBA, RITVA, and others explain
that one may not benefit at all from Melachah done on Yom Tov, even if it
was done by a non-Jew. Enjoying the fruit immediately after Yom Tov would
be benefiting from the Melachah performed by the non-Jew on Yom Tov. By
waiting enough time to pass after Yom Tov, one is no longer considered to
be benefiting from Melachah done on Yom Tov since he could have prepared
the fruit after Yom Tov as well.
This reasoning leads to a leniency and a stringency. In the case of fruit
picked on the first day of Yom Tov when there are two days of Yom Tov
(outside of Israel), the fruit is permitted on the night going into the
second day of Yom Tov after waiting the preparation time. The reason for
this is that if the first day is actually Yom Tov then the fruit are
permitted that evening just like after the end of any Yom Tov, and if the
second day is actually Yom Tov then the fruit was picked on a weekday. On
the other hand, according to this reasoning there is no distinction
between fruit picked for a non-Jew or for a Jew, since no Jew may benefit
from Melachah done on Yom Tov.
(2) The BEHAG (cited in Rashi, DH Lo Teima Lehu), TOSFOS, and others
explain that one must wait the preparation time after Yom Tov as a
*penalty* to discourage people from telling non-Jews to do Melachah for
them.
This reasoning leads to the inverse stringency and leniency. On the one
hand, the preparation time that one must wait must be at a time when it is
*permitted* to do such Melachah. Therefore, fruit picked by a non-Jew on
the first day of Yom Tov would be forbidden until after the preparation
time at the conclusion of the *second* day of Yom Tov. On the other hand,
according to this reason, the requirement to wait after Yom Tov applies
only to the what was picked for a *Jew*. If the non-Jew picked fruit for
himself, it is permitted to use it without waiting until the preparation
time has passed.
The ROSH (Beitzah 3:2) is even more lenient in this regard, and permits
even fruit that was picked for a Jew to be eaten by *other Jews* (other
than the one for whom it was picked, or his family) without waiting until
the preparation time has passed. His logic is that our objective is to
discourage a Jew from instructing a non-Jew to do Melachah for him in the
future. We are not concerned that a Jew will instruct a non-Jew to do
Melachah solely for the benefit of *another* Jew).
(Of course, in any case *no* Jew can eat the fruit on the day upon which
it was picked, because it is Muktzah as explained above.)
HALACHAH: The SHULCHAN ARUCH (OC 515:1) rules like Rashi that no one may
eat fruit picked by a non-Jew on Yom Tov until preparation time has passed
at the end of that day, and therefore it may be eaten even by the person
for whom it was picked immediately after the second day of Yom Tov.
However, the REMA says that common practice is to follow the stricter
opinion of the Behag and Tosfos and not permit the fruit to any Jews until
Motza'ei Yom Tov Sheni, after preparation time has passed.
We do not rely on the ruling of the Rosh to allow the fruit to a Jew other
than the one for whom it was picked, except when it necessary for the
honor of Yom Tov, or Hachnasas Orchim (such as if the fruit is needed to
feed guests on Yom Tov -- see MISHNAH BERURAH (515:12) who discusses
exactly when one may or may not be lenient with feeding guests.)
The MISHNAH BERURAH (515:13) also cites the Taz who rules that in
extenuating circumstances one may rely on the first opinion and permit the
fruit even for the Jew for whom it was picked after waiting the
preparation time at the conclusion of Yom Tov Rishon, like Rashi. In BI'UR
HALACHAH (DH v'Yesh Machmirin) he concludes that the opinion of Rashi is
indeed the more accepted one, and one may be lenient like Rashi whenever
there are other factors involved that allow for leniency.
Next daf
|