POINT BY POINT SUMMARY
Prepared by Rabbi P. Feldman of Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
Ask A Question on the daf
Previous daf
Bava Basra 4
BAVA BASRA 3-5 - sponsored by Harav Ari Bergmann of Lawrence, N.Y.,
out of love for Torah and those who study it.
|
1) ADVISING HEROD TO REBUILD THE MIKDASH
(a) Herod disguised himself and tested Bava ben Buta.
1. Herod: Do you see what that lowly slave (Herod)
did?!
2. Bava ben Buta: What should I do?
3. Herod: Curse him!
4. Bava ben Buta: "Gam b'Mada'acha Melech Al Tekalel".
5. Herod: He is not really a king!
6. Bava ben Buta: He is no less than a rich person or
Nasi - "U'Vchadrei Mishkavecha Al Tekalel Ashir",
"V'Nasi v'Amecha Lo Sa'or".
7. Herod: "V'Amecha" refers to one who acts as one of
your nation - Herod does not!
8. Bava ben Buta: I fear him.
9. Herod: He will not find out - no one else is here!
10. Bava ben Buta: "Ki Of ha'Shamayim Yolich Es ha'Kol".
11. Herod: I am Herod - had I known that Chachamim are
so careful, I would not have killed them! What
should I do to correct my mistake?
12. Bava ben Buta: You destroyed (Chachamim,) the light
of the world - "Ki Ner Mitzvah v'Sorah Or" - go fix
(the Mikdash,) the light of the world - "V'Naharu
Elav Kol ha'Goyim".
13. Herod: I fear the kingdom (of Romi)!
14. Bava ben Buta: Send them a messenger asking
permission to destroy and rebuild it: the messenger
will tarry one year on the way, one year in Romi,
and a year on the way back - by then you will have
finished it!
(b) Herod did so. Romi answered: if you did not yet destroy
it - do not; if you already destroyed it - do not rebuild
it; if you already rebuild it - that is lowly, to ask
permission
after the fact!
1. We know that you are really a slave who killed his
masters!
(c) One who did not see the rebuilt Mikdash never saw a
beautiful building.
1. (Rabah): He used grayish-brown marble and white
marble.
i. Some say, he also used blue stones.
2. He staggered the rows, to leave room for plaster in
between.
3. He thought to cover it with gold; Chachamim said, it
is better as it is, it looks like waves and delights
the eye.
(d) Question: Why did Bava ben Buta counsel him thusly?
1. (Rav Yehudah): Daniel was punished for counseling
the evil Nebuchadnetzar (to do a Mitzvah) -
"V'Chata'ach b'Tzidkah Feruk (redeem your sin
through Tzedakah)...Teheve Archah li'Shlevsach (and
you will have serenity for a long time);
i. Nebuchadnetzar's Tzedakah delayed his
punishment for 12 months!!
(e) Answer #1: Herod was a slave, who is obligated to keep
the Mitzvos, therefore he counseled him thusly.
(f) Answer #2: The only one who could rebuild the Mikdash was
(Herod,) the king.
(g) Question: How do we know that Daniel was punished?
(h) Answer #1 (Rav): "Va'Tikra Esther la'Hasach" - Hasach is
Daniel.
1. This answers according to the opinion that (the name
Hasach hints that) Chatchuhu (they cut him from his
importance).
2. But according to the opinion that (it hints that)
all royal matters are Nechtachin (decided) by him -
what can we answer?
(i) Answer #2: He was thrown into a lion's den.
2) EVERYTHING FOLLOWS THE LOCAL CUSTOM
(a) (Mishnah): Everything is according to the local custom.
(b) Question: What does this come to include?
(c) Answer: A place where they make walls of Lulav or laurel
branches.
(d) (Mishnah): Therefore - if the wall falls, the area it
occupied and the stones belong to both neighbors.
(e) Question: This is obvious!
(f) Answer: We need to hear when it fell into the property
of one neighbor, or one neighbor took the rocks into his
property.
1. One might have thought, he is now Muchzak, the other
must bring proof to get the rocks - the Mishnah
teaches, this is not so.
(g) (Mishnah): Similarly, in a garden - in a place where
people make a wall, one neighbor can force the other.
(h) Question: This implies, only in a place where people make
walls in gardens, one neighbor can force the other -
normally, he cannot force him;
1. (End of the Mishnah): In a valley, in a place where
people don't make a wall, one neighbor cannot force
the other;
2. This implies, normally, he can force him!
3. Summation of question: If normally, one cannot force
his neighbor to build a wall between gardens, all
the more so between fields in a valley!
(i) Answer (Rava): The Mishnah means: normally, a garden is
considered a place where people make a wall, one neighbor
can force the other;
1. Normally, a valley is considered a place where
people don't make a wall, one neighbor cannot force
the other.
3) A SIGN PROVING THAT ONE BUILT THE WALL HIMSELF
(a) (Mishnah): If he wants to build the wall himself, he
builds on his side, and makes a Chazis.
(b) Question: What is a Chazis?
(c) Version #1 - Answer (Rav Huna): He builds the top of the
wall bent towards the neighbor.
1. Question: Why not build it leaning towards himself?
2. Answer: Also his neighbor could do so (and people
would think that both built the wall).
3. Question: Also according to Rav Huna, perhaps the
neighbor will cut off the Chazis and claim that he
built half!
4. Answer: If it is cut, this is recognizable.
(d) Version #2 - Answer (Rav Huna): He builds the top of the
wall bent towards himself.
1. Question: Why not build it leaning towards his
neighbor?
2. Answer: His neighbor could cut it (and claim that he
helped build the wall).
3. Question: Also according to Rav Huna, perhaps the
neighbor will make a Chaszis and claim that he built
half!
4. Answer: If he does so (after the wall is already
built), this is recognizable.
(e) Question: The Mishnah says that he makes a Chazis on the
outside!
(f) This is left difficult.
4b---------------------------------------4b
(g) (R. Yochanan): To make a Chazis, one plasters a Tefach of
the wall on the outside.
1. Question: Why not do so on the inside?
2. Answer: Also his neighbor could do so.
3. Question: Also according to R. Yochanan, perhaps the
neighbor will peel off the Chazis!
4. Answer: That would be recognizable.
(h) Question: What sign can one make for a wall of Lulav
branches?
(i) Answer #1 (Rav Nachman): He should tilt the branches
towards his neighbor.
1. Question: Why not tilt them towards himself?
2. Answer: Also his neighbor could do so.
3. Question: Also according to Rav Nachman, perhaps the
neighbor will cut them!
4. Answer: He plasters them.
5. Question: The neighbor can peel it off!
6. Answer: This would be recognizable.
(j) Answer #2 (Abaye): No sign will help, he must write a
document saying that he built the wall himself.
(k) (Mishnah): If they both build the wall (they build in the
middle, and make signs on both sides).
(l) Question (Rava of Parzika): Neither should make a sign!
(m) Answer (Rav Ashi): The case is, one already made a sign;
1. If the other does not also, people will think that
his neighbor built it himself.
(n) Question (Rava of Parzika): Does the Mishnah teach how to
deal with liars?!
1. Counter-question: (Rav Ashi): Also the beginning of
the Mishnah is an enactment on account of liars!
2. Answer (Rava of Parzika): The beginning of the
Mishnah teaches a law (if one wants to build
himself, he builds on his property) - then, it
teaches how to prevent the other side from lying;
i. But the end of the Mishnah is no Chidush, that
if both build together they build n the middle
- did it only come to teach how to deal with
liars?
(o) Answer (Ravina): The Chidush of the end of the Mishnah is
that a Chazis works on a Lulav wall, unlike Abaye.
4) A FIELD SURROUNDED BY A NEIGHBOR'S FIELDS
(a) (Mishnah): If Reuven's field was surrounded by Shimon's
field on three sides and Shimon built walls on all three
borders, Reuven need not share the cost;
1. R. Yosi says, if he (we shall explain who) fenced
the fourth side, Reuven must pay for everything
(half of all the walls).
(b) (Rav Yehudah): The Halachah follows R. Yosi, who says
that if he fenced the fourth side, Reuven must pay for
everything;
1. The law is the same whether Reuven or Shimon built
the fourth wall.
(c) (Rav Huna): Reuven must pay half the cost of the wall
built.
(d) (Chiya bar Rav): He pays half the cost of a cheap reed
wall.
(e) (Mishnah): If Reuven's field was surrounded by Shimon's
field on three sides and Shimon built walls on all three
borders, Reuven need not share the cost.
(f) Inference: If Shimon fenced the fourth side, Reuven must
pay.
(g) (End of the Mishnah - R. Yosi): If he fenced the fourth
side, Reuven must pay for everything.
(h) According to Rav Huna, we understand the argument (when
he fenced the fourth side) - Chachamim (the first Tana)
obligate only the cost of a cheap reed wall, R. Yosi
obligates half the cost of the wall built.
(i) Question: According to Chiya bar Rav, what do they argue
about?
1. If Chachamim do not obligate the cost of reed walls,
what must Reuven pay?
(j) Answer #1: The money he saves since he need not guard his
field (because it is surrounded by walls).
(k) Answer #2: Reuven must share the cost of only the last
wall.
(l) Answer #3: They argue about Reuven's liability if Shimon
builds the fourth wall.
1. Version #1: Chachamim hold that if Reuven builds the
fourth wall, he must share the cost of all the
walls, but if Shimon builds the fourth wall, Reuven
only shares the cost of the last wall;
2. R. Yosi holds that in either case, he must share the
cost of all the walls.
3. Version #2: Chachamim hold that even if Shimon
builds the fourth wall, Reuven must share the cost;
4. R. Yosi holds that if Reuven builds the fourth wall,
he must share the cost of all the walls, for he
shows that he wants walls around his property;
i. But if Shimon builds the fourth wall, Reuven
does not pay anything.
Next daf
|