A growing
trend is to have permanent makeup applied and thus avoid the prohibition of
applying makeup on Shabbos. Is there any problem with this?
As far as Hilchos Shabbos is concerned there is no problem with
having permanent makeup applied. However, permanent makeup is applied in a
manner very similar to tattooing
which raises a serious problem of tattoo making. A competent rav must be
consulted as to whether it is permitted.
May one use a toilet bowl freshener that colors the water on
Shabbos?
This is a complicated issue and is subject to a machlokes
(disagreement) amongst the poskim. As such, we will not render a
halachic ruling rather we will present the various problems involved and as
for personal conduct one must receive a ruling from one’s rav.
1)
Coloring – The first problem is that the soap colors the water. As we have
learnt in previous sheets it is prohibited to dye any substance other than food
(even foods some say may only be dyed by-the-way, but not solely for the color).
The water
in the toilet bowl is colored on purpose with the intention of giving the water
a fresh and disinfected appearance.
2)
Fragrance – The second problem is adding fragrance to the water. The
Mishna Berura in Hilchos Yom Tov
says that it is forbidden to introduce a fragrance into water intending that the
water smells nice. One cannot say that it is done by-the-way because one’s
intention is to have the water appear fresh and clean.
3)
Nolad – a new substance. Some authorities are concerned with the fact the
soap-like substance is transformed from a solid into a liquid, which is a
problem of Molid, as mentioned in the Rama.
What
about wearing ‘photo gray’ lenses on Shabbos?
Photo gray lenses darken when in sunlight and return to become clear
when out of the sunlight. No coloring is physically added to the lenses in the
process. What happens is that a certain substance in the lens changes color when
in sunlight. When back indoors the normal coloring returns to the lens and the
color disappears. Rav Moshe Feinstein ztz”l ruled that it is not a
problem of ‘coloring’ because nothing is in fact being colored. The proof is
that after a few minutes indoors the color disappears. This process is continued
ad infitum.
Rav
Shlomo Zalman Auerbach ztz”l adds that since one does not do anything in
particular towards coloring the lenses it is permitted. See the following
paragraph.
What about the use of celluloid strip that
is used to measure one’s temperature. Is it a problem of ‘coloring’ due to the
color change in the process?
There are various types on the market and the halacha varies
accordingly. Here too there is a machlokes amongst the poskim with
regards to its use on Shabbos. We will merely present the issues, but for a
ruling one must approach one’s rav.
Type I:
certain squares change color when placed on the forehead indicating whether the
person has a fever. It would appear that it shares the same status as the photo
gray lenses, however in this case one is actively causing the color to change
adding a certain measure of stringency to the issue.
Type II:
Digits or letters are visible even before applying heat to the celluloid strip
and when heat is applied the digits become colored. This type is a bit more
problematic than the previous type because one is coloring letters and making
them more visible.
Type III:
Nothing is visible on the celluloid strip and when heat is applied to the strip
letters or digits become visible. This is far worse than the previous types
because one is executing temporary writing. Even though no ink is added in the
process, nevertheless we find that the P’ri Megadim writes that it is
prohibited to place a piece of paper with invisible ink over a flame thereby
exposing the hidden letters. Rav Shlomo Zalman rules that our case is of a
similar halachic stature and is forbidden to use.
Is one permitted to prepare a saline solution
for a vegetable salad on Shabbos?
At first glance one might ask what is wrong with mixing salt and
water on Shabbos? The answer is that certain saline solutions are used for
pickling vegetables etc.
and Chazal were afraid that if it was permitted to make certain saline
solutions it would ultimately lead to processing items (other than food, such as
leather etc. Pickling food is only an issur d’rabanan) which is an
issur d’oraisso.
This
applies to mixing vinegar and salt and any other type of pickling solution. Rav
Sternbuch shlita pointed out that the prohibition only applies to
saltwater that would be used for pickling but a small amount of salt in a large
volume of water is not a problem at all.
Which saltwater solutions are permitted?
The
Mechaber
tells us that one must prepare a small quantity and not a large one. A small
quantity is not usually used for pickling and thus the entire issue of pickling
is avoided. If one needs to make a large quantity of salt water because one is
catering for many guests, one should either prepare small quantities in several
bowls or add oil to the water before adding the salt. The oil, according to some
poskim,
will weaken the effect of the saltwater thus disabling its ability to be a
pickling agent.