Hilchos B'rachos part XX
The B’racha for Wine
Shulchan Aruch
writes
that
the b’racha recited over wine incorporates all beverages. The poskim
explain that wine is the prime beverage and all other beverages are
considered of lesser importance.
So if I recited a áåøà ôøé äâôï
over wine, I do not recite shehakol for coffee?
That is correct. If for example you made kiddush on Shabbos
day and drank grape juice or wine, and you would like to follow that up with
coffee and cake, you would recite a mezonos on the cake and no b’racha
on the coffee.
Is it the wine that is important or the b’racha?
It appears from most poskim that wine is an important
beverage, which causes other beverages to be considered subservient thereto.
However, from the Levush one can understand that it is not the beverage
that is important rather the fact that wine has a unique b’racha and wine
is used at important functions. Another explanation is
that
the praise stemming from the b’racha covers other beverages as well,
because it is common to drink other beverages with wine.
Does the coffee need to be on the table
when you recite áåøà ôøé äâôï?
Several opinions
hold
that the coffee must be in front of you when you recite the
áåøà ôøé äâôï, while others
hold
that it suffices to have in mind that you want to drink coffee. It is therefore
correct to have the coffee and other beverages on the table when reciting
áåøà ôøé äâôï.
Must a specific quantity be imbibed to include other
beverages?
This is indeed problematic. The Chayei Adam holds that
wine can only include other beverages if one ‘sits down’ to drink wine, but not
if one merely drinks one or two glasses. Many others
however disagree and hold that imbibing any quantity of wine will negate the
need to recite a b’racha for other beverages.
Consequently, the Bi’ur Halacha
suggests that it is correct to drink a substantial quantity of wine, which is
equivalent to a cheek-full of wine (îìà ìåâîéå),
and
thus include other beverages in the b’racha.
But what do I do if I don’t drink enough?
Based on the above, imbibing less than
îìà ìåâîéå of wine or grape juice creates a
problem of whether one must recite a shehakol on Coke or coffee imbibed
after the wine or grape juice. Many have the custom, when being ‘yoitze kiddush’
from someone else, to drink a small amount of ‘kiddush wine’, but as mentioned
this creates a problem. Accordingly it would seem that the best discourse is to
either not drink wine at all
(as it
is totally accepted to be yoitze kiddush without drinking any wine at
all) or to make sure that one drinks ëîìà ìåâîéå.
Another option is to recite a shehakol on something
else, for example on a piece of herring or candy, which will cover the necessary
shehakol for the beverage.
What is the halacha with regards to b’racha acharona?
Just as áåøà ôøé äâôï
includes all beverages in the b’racha rishona, so does
òì äâôï, which is recited after imbibing wine,
include all beverages in the b’racha acharona.
Practically, this means that one who imbibed the required
quantity of wine or grape juice (which is a øáéòéú
äìåâ)
and
also had a soft drink, water or any other beverage, will not recite a
áåøà ðôùåú, as the òì
äâôï includes it.
Birkas Hatov V’hameitiv –
äèåá åäîèéá
Chazal instituted a special b’racha to be recited over
additional wine, to praise Hashem for His benevolence of affording one
this special treat.
Several
conditions must be met to facilitate this b’racha.
1.
The
first bottle of wine was not depleted. If the first wine is depleted one will
not recite äèåá åäîèéá on the additional wine.
The idea is that one still has wine and is lavishing oneself with more wine.
2.
At
least two people are sharing both wines, because äèåá
åäîèéá means good for me and for another.
3.
The
drinking parties must have equal rights to the wine, i.e. both parties may drink
without asking permission from the other party. This practically means that the
host should say to the guest that he may drink freely from the wine. One’s wife
and children are considered partners in the wine.
The second
wine must not be inferior to the first wine. One need not know that the second
wine is superior wine, it suffices to know that it is not inferior.