shabbos candles

Weekly Shabbos Halacha Series
Halachos Series on Hilchos Shabbos

shabbos candles

Published by
Pirchei Shoshanim

A Project of
The Shema Yisrael Torah Network

Written by

Rabbi Dovid
Ostroff, shlita

 

These Halachos were shown by Rabbi Ostroff to
HaGaon HaRav Moshe Sternbuch, shlita

 

Archives


Questions for the Week of Mattos-Massei

 

In the previous shiur we learned that one may peel eggs on Shabbos prior to eating, based on the concept called ‘derech achilah’.

When do you decide that peeling is ãøê àëéìä  and other removals of p’soles from ochel are ãøê áøéøä?

The Bi’ur Halacha [1] quotes theîàîø îøãëé  saying that since one is eating in the normal fashion and peeling is the only practical way to gain access to the food, and one’s intention is merely to eat that which is within the peel, it is permitted.

Peeling a banana prior to eating is not seen as ‘separating ochel from p’soles’ rather it is seen as a manner of eating. Even though technically, Rav Shlomo Zalman points out, one can remove the food by cutting the fruit in half and scraping out the fruit from within the peel, thereby removing the ochel from the p’soles, nevertheless peeling the banana peel or the orange peel is ãøê àëéìä  and permitted.

What difference does it make whether done prior to eating or for the future? 

Prior to consumption is called ãøê àëéìä  but when not prior to eating one is improving and enhancing the food, the classical Borer, and is forbidden. Peeling prior to eating is a means to access the food and it is not seen as improving it, hence it does not conform to the definition of Borer

Why is one permitted to use a knife for peeling? 

The basis for this question is the fact that even when removing ochel from p’soles one must use one’s hand and not a special k’li. Therefore it is imperative for us to know whether a knife is a k’li or an extension of one’s hand.

Rav Moshe Feinstein Ztz”l in the Igross Moshe [2] says that a knife is not a k’li for Borer. Even though one is able to remove a peel with a knife far better than with one’s hands or fingers, Rav Moshe says it does not separate better than one’s hands, one is using a knife because it can cut better - not because it is a better separator. A sieve is a separator a knife is not.

Does it make a difference whether the peel is edible or not?

The Magen Avraham [3] says that apples have the same rule as onions and garlic, and one may only peel apples prior to consumption. The P’ri Megadim [4] asks on the M”A that apple peels are edible and one should be permitted to peel even for future consumption, because it is like cutting two parts of an apple in half. [5] The Mishna Berura [6] quotes the M”A as the main halacha notwithstanding that he quoted the P’ri Megadim in the Sha’ar Ha’tsiun as a kushya. This means that even apples, as all fruit with edible peels, may only be peeled prior to eating.

Is one permitted to use a peeler for peeling fruit?

 We must determine whether a peeler is a sophisticated knife or a separator.

If we accept that a peeler is a separator, i.e. it is a unique k’li for separating, and then it is forbidden to use it even prior to eating. Some poskim view a peeler in such a light. [7] I have recently heard that Rav Moshe Feinstein viewed a peeler as nothing more than a sophisticated knife, similar to his explanation above, and permitted using a peeler on Shabbos prior to consumption.

One must ask one’s rav as to the correct conduct on Shabbos.

According to the P’ri Megadim above (edible peels) using a peeler is not an issue, because removing edible peels is not Borer at all, but as mentioned we rule like the M”A. 

Am I permitted to cut off a bad area of an apple? 

The bad area is considered p’soles and may not be removed on its own. The way to do it is to remove it together with some of the apple, thus removing p’soles together with ochel. It makes sense that if most of the apple is bad; one is permitted to remove the bad area on its own (prior to eating) because it is equal to a peel, which may be removed prior to consumption, even though it is inedible.

Is one permitted to wash fruit on Shabbos, which is in effect removing dirt etc from the fruit?

The Shulchan Aruch [8] tells us that one is forbidden to soak karshinim [9] that are mixed with peels and other refuse in water, which action will separate the karshinim from the peels. The Mishna Berura [10] adds that it is similarly forbidden to pour water over potatoes etc. in order to clean them of their soil particles.

This implies that one is forbidden to wash fruit and vegetables on Shabbos.

Many poskim want to differentiate between soaking in water and washing fruit under running water.

Rav Moshe Feinstein ztz”l [11] presents a few reasons why washing fruit is permissible. 1. When dirt covers the fruit, one may wash it off prior to eating just as one is permitted to peel garlic and onions prior to consumption.

2. In many cases people eat fruit or vegetables without washing these items and in such cases the dirt is not considered p’soles at all.

Rav Moshe concludes that perhaps only soaking in water is considered ãøê áøéøä but washing with water is not.

To be continued be”H.


[1] End of siman 321 ã"ä ì÷ìåó.

[2] àå"ç ç"à ñé' ÷ëã.

[3] Magen Avraham siman 321:30.

[4] àùì àáøäí ì'.

[5] We could say that they are not arguing and are referring to different apples, but that is a ãåç÷.

[6] M”B siman 321:84.

[7] See the SS”K 3 footnote 79 in the name of the àâìé èì.

[8] Siman 319:8.

[9] A type of animal food.

[10] Siman 319:29.

[11] àâ"î àå"ç ç"à ñé' ÷ë"ä.

 

Orchos Chaim LaRosh

 

ìäúøç÷ îï äâàåä áúëìéú äøéçå÷ åëï îï äçðéôåú – to extremely distance oneself from haughtiness and flattery.

            The Rosh teaches us not to flatter people. Why is it so detrimental that it is on par with haughtiness? A Jew must connect to Hashem, which means that all his actions and thoughts should lead to d’veikusåáå úãá÷. Doing chessed for ulterior motives is also chessed, after all the recipient received what he needed, however one’s chessed did not necessarily bring one closer to Hashem. The ultimate åáå úãá÷ was not fully accomplished. Living for other people is the diametrical opposite of living for one’s d’veikus with Hashem and building one’s p’nimius. One’s p’nimius should be the ultimate raison d’être and therefore one should always eradicate feelings of fulfilling mitzvos and learning torah because other people are watching or are expecting one to behave in a certain way.


For a printed version, click here.
 

 


 

One may receive and distribute these weekly shiurim by calling or writing: Office 99 Rechov Bayit Vegan, Yerushalayim,
Phone Numbers:U.S. and Canada 732-370-3344 Israel 972-3-616-6340
 South Africa
078 1655 242 England 44-020-8731-6666 Australia 61-296835626 Switzerland 01141430288
e-mail: shabbosweekly@shemayisrael.com, or www.shemayisrael.com, weekly sponsorships are available as well. 

If you would like to send a question to Rav Ostroff, you can write to him at shabbosweekly@shemayisrael.com.

Note:  The purpose of this series is intended solely for the clarification of the topics discussed and not to render halachic decisions. It is intended to heighten everyone's awareness of important practical questions which do arise on this topic.  One must consult with a proper halachic authority in order to receive p'sak.