Hilchos B'rachos part XXIX
Hilchos Zimun
Three people who have dined
together are obligated to bentch with zimun. This obligation is
biblically sourced in the possuk âãìå ìã' àúé åðøåîîä
ùîå éçãéå, speak of Hashem’s greatness with me, which implicates
that one person is talking to at least two people, and together we will
appreciate His name’s greatness.
Indeed several poskim
learn that the chiyuv is biblical, while others learn that it is a
rabbinical obligation, relying on a possuk for a source. Regardless, it is an
important mitzvah and the Shulchan Aruch
does
not mince words stating that one is chayav to do zimun.
What comprises zimun?
The essence of zimun
is to say ðáøê ùàëìðå îùìå, let us bentch to
the One who we ate from and the others respond áøåê
ùàëìðå îùìå åáèåáå çééðå, boruch is the One who we ate from and we
live because of His goodness.
So why
do we say øáåúé ðáøê?
The Magan Avraham
cites the Zohar saying that one should verbally summon holy actions to
embed them with kedusha.
Consequently we say, gentlemen, let us give praise. After preparing and inviting
others to zimun we say ðáøê ùàëìðå,
which is the actual zimun.
What are the prerequisites
for zimun?
Several factors must exist
to necessitate zimun, 1- eating together, 2- type of food, 3 – eating in
one place, 4 – place of eating, 5 – who joins the zimun.
Eating together
Three people who dined
together must do zimun. Dining together is defined either by beginning to
eat together or ending together.
If two people dined together
and a third joined later: if the two finished eating and the third is still busy
eating, they need not wait for the third to complete, they can bentch without
zimun. If however they concluded their meal and have not as yet bentched and
are at a point where, if offered more food to eat they would eat it, it is not
considered as if they have concluded their meal, but rather as if all concluded
simultaneously and are obligated to bentch.
Type of food
Three people who consumed
bread are obligated to zimun.
What should the third person
eat to complete zimun?
The Shulchan Aruch
cites
various opinions. The first opinion – he should consume a k’zayis of
bread.
Second
opinion – a k’zayis of mezonos, something for which one recites
òì äîçéä.
Third
opinion – a k’zayis of any vegetable or food item.
The Shulchan Aruch
consequently rules that if the third person will not eat bread, it is preferable
not to offer him a beverage or any food so as to avoid the machlokes.
However, the Mishna Berura rules
that
if he does not wish to wash for bread, custom is to offer a drink or any food
item.
Eating in one place
A prerequisite is that all
three people dine in one place as a ÷áéòåú
– a get together. The poskim define this as eating at the same
table or on the same tablecloth (picnic?). The Vilna Ga’on holds that
members of the same family are called a ÷áéòåú
even when dining on separate tables. Milling around is not a
÷áéòåú.
People who would like to eat
together, but for lack of place are eating on separate tables, are called a
÷áéòåú and may do zimun. Consequently,
diners at a wedding even though they are sitting at separate tables are called a
÷áéòåú, because in essence they share the same
simcha and are eating together.
A yeshiva dining hall
is the same. Nobody would object to placing all the tables together and eating
at one long table, because it is for sake of keeping order etc. that tables are
separate. If however, each shiur wants to specifically sit separately from
another shiur, they are not obligated to zimun.
On the other hand, diners in
a café, restaurant or hotel who are sitting at separate tables prefer to
dine alone and not sit with other people, and as such they are not obligated to
zimun.
If
the same waiter serves several tables, the diners at those tables are considered
eating together.
Are people dining in a car
or bus considered a ÷áéòåú?
The Magen Avraham has
his doubts,
because halachically travelers are likened to people walking (øåëá
ëîäìê ãîé) and perhaps they are not called a
÷áéòåú. When in doubt, the poskim say one may perform zimun,
but in presence of ten people, since Hashem’s name is mentioned, one may
not utter Hashem’s name.