Amirah L'akum
In the previous shiur we learned that one may
benefit from a light a gentile turned on (or any other
melacha the gentile did) for his own benefit, and one
may not benefit from a light a gentile turned on (or any
other melacha the gentile did) for a Jew's benefit.
The latter is true even if the gentile is paid for each
individual light and even when the gentile turned on the
light without being told to do so.
Chazal
were concerned that if one was to benefit from the light
turned on a by a gentile, one would instruct him to turn on
a light.
What if he switched it on for both of us?
When the
non-Jew turns on the light for both a Jew and for another
non-Jew, the Jew may not benefit from the light.
However, when the non-Jew who turned on the light is in the
picture, i.e. he did it for himself, if we know that he had
the Jew in mind as well, it is a dispute between the
Magen Avraham and the Chayei Adam whether the Jew
may benefit from the light.
In such a case a Rav should be consulted.
If I instruct a non-Jew to wash the dishes and he turns on the
lights, may I benefit from that light?
The Taz
says that
in such a case it is considered as if the non-Jew turned on
the lights for his own sake and not for mine, even though he
is washing my dishes; and I may duly benefit from the light.
This halacha is tricky, because if I
ask a non-Jew
to
accompany me in order to get something from my dark
storeroom, and he turns on the light, it is considered as if
he turned it on for me even though he is coming with me, and
I may not benefit from this light.
However, if I instruct him to go to the
storeroom for something and he turns on the light, I may
benefit from that light.
The difference is that in the former case the
non-Jew is accompanying me and the light he turns on
is for me, but in the latter case he is turning it on so
that he can see where he is going, even though
ultimately he is going for me.
May one ask a non-Jew to turn on the heating?
We find
that Chazal were very concerned with regards to
children’s welfare. Since cold weather can be detrimental to
their health, Chazal permitted a non-Jew to turn on
the heating on Shabbos in cold countries.
Accordingly, there is no problem to have a non-Jew turn on
the central heating (when it was not preset with a time
switch), because children require heat to remain healthy.
Is there a difference between a bonfire and central heating?
As
mentioned last week, one light caters for many, and
therefore when a non-Jew turns a light on for himself, a Jew
may benefit from it. However there is an opinion
that a bonfire is different, because the more people warming
themselves around a bonfire the more wood is needed to make
it bigger, and therefore if a non-Jew makes a bonfire for
himself one is forbidden to sit by it (according to this
opinion) lest he adds wood for the sake of the Jew.
If a non-Jew turned on the heating when it was prohibited to do so,
what is one supposed to do?
The Rama
says that one does not have to leave the house if a non-Jew
turned on a light or the heating, but nevertheless the Jew
is forbidden to do anything he could not have done before.
That means that if he could not read beforehand, because of
poor reading light, he may not read now.
He may not warm himself in front of the fire,
yet he may remove his sweater he was wearing due to the
cold, just as he may walk in his house at a quicker pace
than he could have, before the non-Jew turned on the light.
How would this apply to a building with a central heating system
where both Jews and non-Jews are resident?
In extremely cold weather, or when children
dwell in the flat, there is no problem whatsoever.