Previous daf

1)

(a) What is the proof from the Pasuk in Re'ei (in connection with the Heter Bamos) "Ki Lo Ba'sem el ha'Menuchah ve'el ha'Nachalah", that Bamos were permitted between Shiloh and Yerushalayim?

(b) Resh Lakish asked Rebbi Yochanan why the Tana did not then include Ma'aser Sheini (together with of Kodshim Kalim) during this period.
What did the latter reply?

(c) What did Resh Lakish then ask Rebbi Yochanan from Pesach and Kodshim?

(d) Rebbi Yochanan therefore retracted from his previous answer, establishing the author as Rebbi Shimon.
What does Rebbi Shimon say about Kodshim other than Pesach and Chovos with a fixed time?

(a) How will Rebbi Yochanan's final interpretation explain why the Tana omits Ma'aser Sheini?

(b) Rav Ada bar Masna bears out what we extrapolate from Rebbi Yochanan's statement.
What does Rav Ada bar Masna say with regard to Ma'aser Beheimah and Ma'aser Sheini, according to Rebbi Yehudah?

(c) We ask on this however, from the Pasuk "Va'achaltem Lifnei Hashem Elokeichem" (in connection with Kodshim and Ma'aser Sheini).
What is the Kashya from there?

(d) And we answer from a Beraisa quoted by Rav Yosef.
What does the Beraisa say? To which Biyros is he referring?

(a) What does Rebbi Yehudah in a Beraisa prove from the Pesukim in Yirmiyah "Haysah Li Nachalasi ke'Aryeh be'Ya'ar" and "ha'Ayit Tzavu'a Nachalasi Li, ha'Ayit Saviv Alehah" (see Agados Maharsha)?

(b) And what does Rebbi Shimon prove from the Pesukim in Tehilim "Zos Menuchasi Adei Ad, Poh Eishev ki Ivisihah" and "Ki Bachar Hashem be'Tziyon, Ivah le'Moshav Lo"?

(c) How will Rebbi Shimon explain the Pasuk in Re'ei Ki Lo Ba'sem ad Atah el ha'Menuchah ve'el ha'Nachalah" (instead of vice-versa)?

(d) According to Tana de'Bei Rebbi Yishmael, both "Menuchah" and "Nachalah" refer to Shiloh. What does Rebbi Shimon bar Yochai say (see Rashash)?

4)

(a) How will the latter two Tana'im explain the Lashon "el ha'Menuchah *ve'el* ha'Nachalah" (and not just "el ha'Menuchah ve'Nachalah")?

(b) Why, according to Tana de'bei Rebbi Yishmael is, Shiloh referred to as ...

1. ... "Menuchah"?
2. ... "Nachalah"?

(c) According to Rebbi Shimon bar Yochai, on the other hand, Yerushalayim is referred to as "Nachalah", because it is a 'Nachalas Olamim' (an everlasting inheritance). But why is it called "Menuchah"?

(a) What are the ramifications of the Machlokes between Tana de'Bei Rebbi Yishmael and Rebbi Shimon bar Yochai?

(b) What problem does the episode with Mano'ach raise? What did he do that would appear to be wrong according to the opinion of Tana de'Bei Rebbi Yishmael (as well as according to the previous Tana'im)?

(c) What do we answer?

(d) What did we mean when, commenting on a Beraisa learned in the Beis-Hamedrash of Rebbi Shimon bar Yochai, that Tana de'Bei Rebbi Yishmael learned (Zeh va'Zeh Yerushalayim') like their Rebbe, we gave a Si'man 'Mashchi Gavra le'Gavri'?

(a) We learned in our Mishnah that if someone sacrificed ba'Chutz an animal during the era of Isur Bamos, that was declared Hekdesh during the era of Heter Bamos, he is not Chayav Kareis.
How does Rav Kahana qualify this ruling? To which Avodah will this not apply?

(b) How does he learn this from the Pasuk in Acharei-Mos "Va'aleihem Tomar ... "?

(c) What do we learn from the previous Pasuk (which refers to Shechitah of the above animal and), which ends "Tiheyeh *Zos* Lahem le'Dorosam"?

(d) Besides asking from the Beraisa that we are bout to discuss, how does Rabah refute Rav Kahana's Limud from the spelling of "Va'aleihem ... "?

(a) Rebbi Shimon lists all the Halachos of the Shechitah and the Ha'ala'ah, in connection with all the possible computations of Heter Bamos and Isur Bamos.
What will be the Din if someone both declares Hekdesh and sacrifices the animal ...

1. ... during the Isur Bamos?
2. ... during the Heter Bamos?

(b) And what does he say about someone who either Shechts or sacrifices in the era of ...

1. ... Isur Bamos, an animal that was declared Hekdesh during the era of Heter Bamos?
2. ...Heter Bamos, an animal that was declared Hekdesh during the era of Isur Bamos?

(c) What does this Beraisa prove?

(d) What does our Mishnah learn from the Pesukim ...

1. ... "Lifnei Hashem ve'Samach" (Vayikra), "Tzafonah Lifnei Hashem" (ibid.), "ve'Zarak ha'Dam al ha'Mizbe'ach Saviv ... Asher Pesach Ohel Mo'ed" (Acharei-Mos)?
2. ... "Ve'heinif ha'Kohen Lifnei Hashem" (Shemini) and "ve'Higishah el ha'Mizbe'ach" (Vayikra)?

(a) We learned in our Mishnah 'Rebbe Yehudah Omer, Ein Minchah be'Bamah'.
What does Rav Sheishes then say about Ofos?

(b) How does he learn this from "Zevachim" and "Osam" (mentioned in the Parshah of Shechutei Chutz)?

(c) And what does the Tana learn from the Pasuk there "Ve'zarak ha'Kohen es ha'Dam Pesach Ohel Mo'ed" and from the Pesukim in Tetzaveh "Leshareis ba'Kodesh" and "Asher Yesharsu bam ba'Kodesh"?

(d) And what does he finally learn from the Pesukim "Ve'hikriv ha'Cheilev le'Rei'ach Nicho'ach ... Isheh Rei'ach Nicho'ach la'Shem" (Vayikra), "Ve'haysah ha'Reshes ad Chatzi *ha*'Mizbe'ach" (Tetzaveh) and "u've'Korvosam el ha'Mizbe'ach Yirchatzu"( Ki Sisa)?

(a) What distinction does Rami bar Chama make between Kodshim of a Bamah Gedolah and Kodshim of a Bamah Ketanah that one sprinkled on a Bamah Gedolah (see Shitah Mekubetzes)?

(b) Rabah (perhaps this to read 'Rava') queries this from a Beraisa. The Tana there states 'Chazeh ve'Chok (of a Shelamim) u'Terumas Lachmei Todah Nohagin be'Kodshei Bamah Gedolah ve'Ein Nohagin be'Kodshei Bamah Ketanah'. What does this imply?

(c) What is then Rabah's Kashya on Rami bar Chama?

(d) How do we amend the Beraisa to reconcile it with Rami bar Chama?

(a) What does Rami bar Chama say in the second Lashon?

(b) What does Rabah then ask from the Beraisa?

(c) What do we answer?

(d) This does not however conform with the opinion of Rebbi Elazar.
What does Rebbi Elazar say about an Olas Bamas Yachid that is taken, after the Shechitah, into the confines of a Bamah Gedolah?

Next daf