POINT BY POINT SUMMARY
Prepared by Rabbi P. Feldman of Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
Ask A Question on the daf
Previous daf
Zevachim 24
ZEVACHIM 24-25 - sponsored by Harav Ari Bergmann of Lawrence, N.Y., out of
love for the Torah and for those who study it.
|
1) THE KOHEN MUST BE ON THE FLOOR
(a) (Mishnah): If he was standing on top of vessels or an
animal or another person's feet, his Avodah is Pasul.
(b) Question: What is the source of this?
(c) Version #1 - Rashi - Answer (Tana d'vei R. Yishmael): The
floor of the Azarah is Kodesh, and Klei Shares are
Kodoshim;
(d) Version #2 - Tosfos - Answer (Tana d'vei R. Yishmael):
The floor of the Azarah is Mekadesh one who stands on it
to serve, and Klei Shares (i.e. Bigdei Kehunah) are
Mekadesh the Kohen to serve; (end of Version #2)
1. Just as a Chatzizah between the Kohen and the Klei
Shares is Posel, also between him and the floor.
(e) The Mishnah could not have omitted the latter cases.
1. If it only taught standing on top of vessels, one
might have thought that this is Chotzetz because
vessels are not flesh, but an animal is not a
Chatzizah;
2. If it only taught standing on animals, one might
have thought that this is Chotzetz, but standing on
a person is not.
(f) (Beraisa - R. Eliezer): If one foot was on the floor and
the other was on top of a vessel or rock, if the vessel
or rock could be removed and he could stand on the other
foot, the Avodah is Kosher, if not, it is Pasul.
(g) Version #1 Question (R. Ami): If a stone of the floor
came loose and one stood on it, what is the law?
1. If he is not intending to reattach it, surely it is
a Chatzizah;
2. The question is when he intends to reattach it:
i. Since he intends to reattach it, it is as if it
is attached;
ii. Or, since it is now detached, it is a
Chatzizah?
(h) Version #2 - Rabah Zuti - Question (R. Ami): If a stone
of the floor was uprooted and he stood in its place, what
is the law?
1. Question: What is he unsure about?
2. Answer #1: He is unsure whether David was Mekadesh
only the floor, or also underneath it (all the way
down).
3. Objection: If so, he should have asked about if the
entire floor was uprooted!
4. Answer #2: Rather, surely David was also Mekadesh
underneath the floor;
i. The question is whether or not standing where a
rock is missing is a proper way to do Avodah.
(i) This question is not resolved.
2) "AVODAH" WITH THE LEFT HAND
(a) (Mishnah): If he received the blood with his left hand,
it is Pasul; R. Shimon says, it is Kosher.
(b) (Beraisa): "V'Lakach...b'Etzba'o" - This teaches that
Kabalah must be with the right hand.
1. "B'Etzba'o v'Nasan" - This teaches that Zerikah must
be with the right hand.
2. R. Shimon: It does not say 'Yad' regarding Kabalah;
i. It does say "B'Etzba'o v'Nasan" (therefore, the
right hand must be used for Zerikah).
ii. Since it does not say 'Yad' regarding Kabalah,
it may be done with the left hand.
(c) Question: What is R. Shimon's reason?
1. If he learns a Gezerah Shavah (from Metzora), he
should require the right hand for Kabalah, even if
it does not say 'Yad'!
2. If he does not learn a Gezerah Shavah, he should not
require the right hand for Kabalah, even if it would
say 'Yad'!
(d) Answer #1 (Rav Yehudah): Really, he does not learn a
Gezerah Shavah;
1. He said, since it does not say 'Yad Yamin' regarding
Kabalah, if he received with his left hand it is
Kosher.
(e) Question #1 (Rabah): If so, he should say the same
regarding Zerikah!
(f) Question #2 (Rabah): R. Shimon does learn a Gezerah
Shavah!
1. (Beraisa - R. Shimon): Wherever it says 'Yad' or
'Etzba', it refers to the right hand or finger.
(g) Answer #2 (Rava): Really, he learns a Gezerah Shavah;
1. He said, since it does not say 'Yad' regarding
Kabalah, rather 'Etzba', and one cannot receive the
blood with his finger, (we only learn that the right
hand is required regarding Zerikah (which is
possible with the finger)), Kabalah with the left
hand is Kosher.
(h) Objection (Rav Sama brei d'Rav Ashi): If there is a
handle on the vessel, one can receive the blood (by
holding the vessel) with his finger!
(i) Answer #3 (Abaye): They argue whether "B'Etzba'o" is
expounded to refer to what comes earlier (Kabalah) and/or
later (Zerikah) in the verse.
24b---------------------------------------24b
1. (Chachamim say that it is expounded to refer to
both; R. Shimon says, it only teaches about Zerikah,
which comes later.)
(j) (Abaye): R. Elazar b'Rebbi Shimon argues with his father
and with Chachamim.
1. (Beraisa - R. Elazar b'Rebbi Shimon): Wherever it
says 'Etzba' regarding Kabalah (but not Zerikah,
e.g. in the above verse, of an individual's Chatas),
if he deviated (e.g. used his left hand) in Kabalah
it is Pasul, if he deviated in Zerikah, it is
Kosher;
2. Wherever it says 'Etzba' regarding Zerikah (but not
Kabalah), if he deviated in Zerikah it is Pasul, if
he deviated in Kabalah, it is Kosher.
(k) Question: Where does it says 'Etzba' regarding Zerikah?
(l) Answer: "V'Lakachta...v'Nasata...b'Etzba'echa" (regarding
the bull of the inauguration of the Mishkan).
(m) He holds that it is expounded to refer to what comes
earlier (Zerikah), not what comes before that (Kabalah),
and not what comes later (Zerikah, in the above verse
"V'Lakach b'Etzba'o v'Nasan").
3) WHICH "AVODAH" REQUIRES THE RIGHT HAND?
(a) (Rabah bar bar Chanah): 'Etzba' and 'Kehunah' always
teach that the right hand is required.
1. We are thinking that this is only when it says both
of them - "V'Lakach ha'Kohen...b'Etzba'o v'Nasan"
2. We learn from Metzora, by which it says "V'Taval
ha'Kohen Es Etzba'o ha'Ymanis".
(b) Question: Regarding Kemitzah, it only says 'Kohen';
1. (Mishnah): If Kemitzah was done with the left hand,
it is Pasul.
(c) Answer (Rabah): 'Etzba' *or* 'Kehunah' by itself teaches
that the right hand is required.
(d) Question (Abaye): Regarding Holachah of limbs to the
Altar, it says Kohen - "V'Hikriv ha'Kohen..."
1. This refers to bringing the limbs to the ramp.
2. (Mishnah): (One Kohen carries) the right leg in his
left hand, the place where it was cut faces himself!
(e) Answer: 'Etzba' or 'Kehunah' teaches that the right hand
is required regarding something that is Me'akev
atonement, similar to (sprinkling on a) Metzora (from
which we learned).
(f) Question: But it says 'Kehunah' regarding Kabalah, and it
is Me'akev atonement (and R. Shimon is Machshir with the
left hand)!
1. (Mishnah): If Kabalah was done with the left hand,
it is Pasul;
2. R. Shimon says, it is Kosher.
(g) Answer: R. Shimon says that it must say both 'Etzba' and
'Kehunah'.
(h) Question: R. Shimon does not require both!
1. (Beraisa - R. Shimon): Wherever it says 'Yad', this
refers to the right hand; 'Etzba' always refers to
the right finger.
(i) Answer: (He holds that) 'Etzba' by itself teaches that
the right hand is required, 'Kehunah' by itself does not
teach this.
(j) Question: What do we learn from 'Kehunah'?
(k) Answer: He must be (wearing Bigdei Kehunah) like a Kohen.
(l) Question: Regarding Zerikah it only says 'Kehunah';
1. (Mishnah): If Zerikah was done with the left hand,
it is Pasul;
2. R. Shimon does not argue!
(m) Answer: A Beraisa teaches that he does argue.
1. (Beraisa): If Kabalah was done with the left hand,
it is Pasul;
2. R. Shimon says, it is Kosher.
3. If Zerikah was done with the left hand, it is Pasul;
4. R. Shimon says, it is Kosher.
Next daf
|