THOUGHTS ON THE DAILY DAF
brought to you by Kollel Iyun Hadaf of Har Nof
Rosh Kollel: Rav Mordecai Kornfeld
Ask A Question about the Daf
Previous daf
Zevachim, 77
ZEVACHIM 77-78 - Dedicated to the leaders and participants in the Dafyomi
shiurim at the Young Israel of New Rochelle, by Andy & Nancy Neff
|
77b
1) OFFERING TWO LIMBS AT A TIME FROM A FORBIDDEN MIXTURE
OPINIONS: The Mishnah quotes Rebbi Eliezer who rules that in a case in which
the limbs of valid Korbanos became mixed with the limbs of a blemished
animal, if one of the heads was offered already, then the rest of the heads
may also be offered. In the Gemara, Rebbi Elazar states that Rebbi Eliezer
only permits offering the remaining, similar limbs if two are brought at a
time, but not one at a time. RASHI (DH Ela Shenayim) explains the reasoning
behind this. When two limbs are offered at the same time, then we know that
one of them is definitely a permitted limb from a valid Korban. Since
("Migu") one of them is certainly permitted, we assume that the second one
is also permitted, and that the forbidden limb was the first one that was
offered earlier.
Does this reasoning apply in a case in which the limbs of valid Korbanos
became mixed with the limbs of *two* blemished animals? In such a case, it
certainly will not suffice to offer two similar limbs at a time, because it
is possible that both limbs are from the blemished animals! However, will it
suffice to offer three limbs at one time, or must one offer four limbs at
one time?
(a) The SHACH (YD 110:47) asserts that *four* limbs must be offered at one
time. As Rashi explains, when there is only one piece of Isur, one may offer
two limbs at a time, because we apply the principle of "Migu" and say that
just as one limb is definitely permitted, the other is also permitted.
However, when there are two pieces of Isur, it will not suffice to offer
three limbs at a time. Even though it is true that one of the three is
definitely permitted, the "Migu" that one is permitted can only be used to
prove that *one* other piece is permitted, but not that *two* other pieces
are permitted, because here there is a chance that *both* of the other two
are forbidden (since there were two pieces of Isur in the mixture). In order
to apply the "Migu," there must be *two* pieces of definite Heter, and only
then can we say that since two are definitely permitted, the other two are
also permitted.
Accordingly, the Shach rules that when two pieces of Isur become mixed with
pieces of Heter and one piece was offered already, Rebbi Eliezer maintains
that in order to permit offering the remaining pieces, *four* pieces must be
offered on the Mizbe'ach at one time.
(b) The CHAZON ISH (YD 37:20) disagrees with the Shach. He asserts that
there is no logic to say that since there is one definite piece of Heter
being offered, the other piece is also a piece of Heter. The Gemara does not
mean to use any reasoning of "Migu" to permit the two pieces to be brought
together. Rather, the reason why Rebbi Eliezer requires that two pieces be
brought at one time is in order that the Korban that is being offered on the
Mizbe'ach have the title of a permitted Korban, a Korban of Heter. As long
as there is definitely a piece of Heter being offered, the offering has the
title and status of Heter, and it does not concern us that the other piece
might be Asur. Accordingly, even if there are two other pieces that might be
Asur, the fact that one piece is definitely one of Heter gives the Korban
the status of a permitted Korban and the mixture may be offered on the
Mizbe'ach. (M. Dicker)
Next daf
|