REVIEW QUESTIONS ON GEMARA AND RASHI
prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Jerusalem
Previous daf
Yoma 7
|
YOMA 7 (Teves 23) - has been dedicated to the memory of Nachum ben Shlomo
Dovid Mosenkis on the day of his Yahrzeit, by his son, Sid Mosenkis (Queens,
NY)
|
1)
(a) From where do we learn the concession of Tum'ah be'Tzibur?
(b) Does this principle apply to all types of Tum'ah?
2)
(a) We learned above that according to Rav Sheishes, Tum'ah Dechuyah Hi
be'Tzibur.
How does he prove this from a Beraisa in Menachos with regard
to a Kohen who was bringing the Minchas ha'Omer, when it became Tamei?
(b) Rav Nachman refutes this proof on the basis of 'Modina Heicha de'Ika
Shirayim la'Achilah'.
What does he mean by that?
3)
(a) Rav Sheishes then brings proof from another Beraisa there, which issues
an equivalent ruling with regard to a Kohen who was bringing a Minchas
Parim, ve'Eilim u'Kevasim'.
What is his proof from *there*?
(b) How does Rav Nachman counter this proof (to explain the Beraisa even if
we normally hold 'Tum'ah Hutrah Hi be'Tzibur')?
4)
What happens in both of the above cases when there is no re-placement flour
or animal available? What do the other Kohanim then say to the Kohen who is
bringing the Korban?
5)
(a) 'Dam she'Nitma, ve'Zarko, be'Shogeg, Hurtzah, be'Meizid, Lo Hurtzah'.
According to Rav Sheshes, what does 'be'Meizid, Lo Hurtzah' mean?
(b) Why do the owners not need to bring a new Korban?
6)
(a) How does Rav Nachman establish the Beraisa which seems to make no
distinction between Shogeg and Meizid, *Yachid and Tzibur*, the Tzitz always
atones for the blood, the flesh and the Cheilev that became Tamei.
How
does he explain 'be'Tzibur' (according to the first answer)?
(b) In the second answer, Rav Nachman establishes the Beraisa by certain
Korbenos Tzibur which also need the Tzitz to atone for them.
Which ones?
7)
(a) The Pasuk of "ve'Nasa Aharon es Avon ha'Kodashim" (Tetzaveh) -which is
speaking about Ritzuy Tzitz, cannot be referring to the sin of Pigul or to
that of Nosar.
What do Pigul and Nosar mean in this context?
(b) Why can the Pasuk not be referring to them?
(c) The Beraisa concludes that the Tzitz atones for the sin of Tum'ah.
Why
does the Tzitz atone for Tum'ah more than for 'Pigul' and 'Nosar'?
(d) The Berasia explicitly mentions 'Hutrah'! How does Rav Sheishes
reconcile this with his own opinion?
Answers to questions
7b---------------------------------------7b
8)
(a) According to Rebbi Shimon, the Tzitz atones for Kodshim which became
Tamei, whether they became Tamei whilst the Kohen Gadol was wearing it or
not.
What does Rebbi Yehudah hold?
(b) How does Rebbi Shimon prove his point from the Kohen Gadol on Yom Kipur?
(c) How does Rebbi Yehudah repudiate the proof?
(d) In which case does Rebbi Shimon agree that the Tzitz does not atone?
9)
What is the basis of the Machlokes between Rebbi Yehudah and Rebbi Shimon?
10)
(a) The Pasuk in Tetzaveh writes "ve'Hayah Al Metzach Aharon, ve'Nasa Aharon
es Avon ha'Kodashim ... ve'Hayah Al Mitzcho Tamid, le'Ratzon Lahem Lifnei
Hashem".
How does each Tana prove his opinion from here, Rebbi Yehudah
from the first half of the Pasuk, and Rebbi Shimon from the second?
(b) How does Rebbi Shimon know that "Tamid" does not mean that it must
*always* be on the Kohen Gadol's forehead?
(c) How does Rebbi Yehudah explain "Tamid"?
(d) What Halachah does Rebbi Yehudah learn from a Kal va'Chomer from Tzitz?
Answers to questions
Next daf
|