POINT BY POINT SUMMARY
by Rabbi Ephraim Becker
Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim
Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
Ask A Question on the daf
Previous daf
Yoma 46
|
YOMA 46-48 - have been anonymously sponsored towards a REFU'AH SHELEMAH to
Shmuel Yakov ben Ayala Hinda, Ilana Golda bas Chana and Klarees Marcia bas
Mammie.
|
1) THE SEPARATE MA'ARACHAH FOR EIVARIM AND PEDARIM
(a) (R. Elazar citing b. Kapara reporting that R. Meir taught)
The leftover Eivarim of the Olos were brought on a specially
lit Ma'arachah, even on Shabbos.
(b) Question: Our Mishnah already mentioned that Ma'arachah?!
(c) Answer: We would not have known that the Pesulin are also
treated likewise.
1. This is providing they had been somewhat burnt.
2. Alternately, both Kosher and Pasul Eivarim are treated
alike.
(d) Question: Our Mishnah already taught that the Ma'arachah was
made on Yom Kipur (the fifth Ma'arachah)!?
(e) Answer: We would not have known to do so on Yom Kipur which
falls during the week.
(f) Question: What!? The Mishnah says "every day?!"
(g) Answer: Good question.
2) A SEPARATE MA'ARACHAH ON SHABBOS FOR FRIDAY'S KORBANOS
(a) The teaching of R. Elazar above argues with R. Huna who
taught that the *end* of the Tamid is *not* Docheh.
(b) Question: What is the end not Docheh, Tumah or Shabbos?
(c) Answer: R. Chisda holds it is Docheh Shabbos but not Tumah
while Rava holds the opposite.
(d) Question: Whichever Derashah teaches one should teach the
other (a question on both Rava and R. Chisda)!?
46b---------------------------------------46b
(e) Answer (Rava for himself): The concluding Avodah (Haktaras
Eivarim) is learned from the starting Avodah (Shechitah and
Zerikah which can be done BeTumah but not on Shabbos).
(f) Answer (Rava for R. Chisda): Shabbos is *Hutrah* (creating
greater Heter) whereas Tumah is *Dechuyah* by Korbanos
Tzibur (creating minimal Heter [only the starting Avodah]).
3) EXTINGUISHING COALS REMOVED FROM THE MIZBEACH
(a) Abaye says one is Chayav for extinguishing, Rava says one is
Patur (speaking when the coals have been taken down from the
Mizbeach, not when they are still on the Mizbeach, where one
is certainly Chayav).
(b) Abaye still considers it "Eish HaMizbeach" while Rava sees
it as separated from its source.
(c) Question: Is the Halachah of R. Nachman (citing Rabah b.
Avuhah that one is Chayav for extinguishing a removed coal)
then only according to Abaye?!
(d) Answer: Even Rava could subscribe to R. Nachman since
*those* coals were not removed for their Mitzvah.
(e) Alternate Rendition: Rava and Abaye agree that one is Patur
for extinguishing a removed coal, they argue when one
extinguishes the coal on the Mizbeach.
1. Abaye still considers it Eish... Rava sees it as
separated.
2. Question: R. Nachman is then not like Abaye or Rava?!
3. Answer: Those coals were not removed for their Mitzvah.
Hadran Alach Taraf BeKalfi
Next daf
|