POINT BY POINT SUMMARY
by Rabbi Ephraim Becker Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
Ask A Question on the daf
Previous daf
Yoma 5
1) BACK TO RESH LAKISH AND R. YOCHANAN (bottom of 4b)
(a) We may infer that they both hold that whatever is written in
the Parashas Miluim is Me'akev (aligning with one side in
the Machlokes below).
2) R. YOCHANAN AND R. CHANINA ON WHAT IS ME'AKEV BY MILUIM
(a) There is a Machklokes whether all details of the Miluim are
Me'akev, or only those details which are normally Me'akev.
(b) We may conclude that R. Yochanan is of the opinion that all
the details are Me'akev.
1. This is based on the question which Resh Lakish asked
on R. Yochanan (that if Perishah is learned from Miluim
then it should be Me'akev by Yom HaKipurim, as well).
2. R. Yochanan, by not responding, showed his agreement.
(c) Question: Of what (Halachic) difference is their dispute?
(d) Answer #1: Semichah.
1. Question: How do we know that Semichah is normally not
Me'akev?
2. Answer: From a Bereisa which speaks of Semichah as the
Kaparah of the Korban, but in the end teaches that its
absence does not prevent the Kaparah.
(e) Answer #2: Tenufah (same Q&A sequence follows as above).
(f) Answer #3: Perishas Shiv'a.
1. Question: Whence that Perishah is normally not Me'akev?
2. Answer: Because the substitute Kohen is not segregated.
(g) Answer #4: Ribui Begadim and Meshichah during the seven
days.
1. Question: Whence that these are normally not Me'akev?
2. Answer: The Bereisa learns it from "Asher Yimshach Oso
V'Asher Yimalei Es Yado."
3. Question: Then whence that Meshichas Shivah is even a
Mitzvah L'Chatchilah?
4. Answer #1: The Pasuk in Tetzaveh links Meshichah to
Ribui Begadim.
(h) Question: What is the reason for saying that all details of
the Miluim are Me'akev?
(i) Answer: The word "Kachah" in Parashas Tetzaveh implies Ikuv.
5b---------------------------------------5b
(j) Question: But what about the details in Parashas Tzav where
the word Kachah does not appear?
(k) Answer #1: A Gezeirah Shavah connects the two Parshios.
(l) Answer #2: Mishmeres in Parashas Tzav implies Ikuv.
(m) Answer #3: Ki Chen Tziveisi means that it is all l'Ikuva.
1. The Bereisa explores the meaning of the repetition of
"Tziveisi," "Tziveisi" and "Tzivah HaShem."
2. The first, that the Korban should be eaten b'Aninus;
the second was the (erroneous) ruling in this case; the
third was to indicate that this ruling is not in error,
but rather the command of HaShem.
(n) The Michnasayim and Asiris HaEifah are not written in the
Parashah, but are included with a Derashah.
(o) Question: Unlike the Michnasayim, Asiris HaEifah is not
written here at all, so where do we learn it as an
obligation during the Miluim
(p) Answer: Gezeirah Shavah from "Zeh."
(q) Question: Whence that even reading the Parashah is Me'akev?
(r) Answer: HaDavar Asher Tzivah HaShem.
3) DONNING THE BIGDEI KEHUNAH
(a) Question: In what order did Moshe dress Aharon and his sons?
(b) Answer: Whatever was, was!
(c) Question: But how *will* they Kohanim be dressed?
(d) Answer: In the days to come we will see how Moshe dresses
Aharon!!
(e) Question: We wish to know the order to understand the Pasuk.
1. The Pesukim seem to contradict, were they dressed
together or separately?
2. It is a dispute whether he dressed Aharon first or both
together.
3. (Abaye) The dispute is only regarding the Avnet.
Next daf
|