Nidah 21
21bQUESTION: In the Sugya of Shefoferes the Gemara cites two arguments between Rebbi Eliezer (Tana Kama) and the Rabanan. (1) First, when blood is found in the cracks of the lump of flesh, Rebbi Eliezer rules that the woman is Tamei. Rabanan argue, claiming that this is not menstrual blood. It is blood *of the lump*, which is Tahor. (2) Next, Rebbi Eliezer holds that even if *menstrual* blood is found *inside the lump*, the woman is Tahor. The Gemara infers that Rabanan rule more stringently; she is Tamei in this case.It is sufficient to infer from Rabanan's statement that blood *in the cracks* of the lump is Tamei. This is in fact Abaye's position at the next stage of the Sugya. How does the Gemara know that there is a second argument, with regard to the *menstrual* blood *in the lump*? (DH Ha)
ANSWER:
|
Shema Yisrael Torah Network
adam@shemayisrael.co.il
http://www.shemayisrael.co.il
Jerusalem, Israel
972-2-532-4191
In the U.S.:
Tel. (908) 370-3344
Fax. (908) 367-6608
Toll free line for dedications: 1-800-574-2646