(Permission is granted to print and redistribute this material
as long as this header and the footer at the end are included.)


ANSWERS TO REVIEW QUESTIONS

prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Jerusalem

Megilah 2

MEGILAH 2-5 (Elul 27-Rosh Hashanah 5760) - have been dedicated by Dr. Jack and Sarah Dimenstein of Zurich Switzerland. May they be blessed with a year of health and prosperity, physical and spiritual!

Questions

Please note that unless where otherwise indicated, we follow the explanation of Rashi.
Our notes and comments do not necessarily have a bearing on the practical Halachah.

1)

(a) The Megilah can be read on the eleventh, the twelfth, the thirteenth, the fourteenth and the fifteenth of Adar.

(b)

1. Mukafin (people who live in cities that were walled from the time of Yehoshua bin Nun) read it - on the fifteenth?
2. Townspeople read it - on the fourteenth?
(c) The villagers read the Megilah - on the fourteenth, should it occur on Monday or Thursday. Otherwise, they may read it on the previous Monday or Thursday (whichever is closer), should they so wish.
2) According to the Tana of our Mishnah, when the fourteenth falls ...
1. ... on Sunday - the townspeople read it on that day, the Mukafin on Monday, and the villagers on the previous Thursday.
2. ... on Friday - the townspeople and the Mukafin read it on the same day.
3. ... on Shabbos - the townspeople read it on the previous Thursday, together with the villagers.
3)
(a) The Gemara rejects its original question 'From where do we know that the Megilah can be read on the eleventh, the twelfth and the thirteenth'? - on the grounds that it is not an obligation to read earlier (that we need to find a reason for it). It is a concession, whose reason we already know (i.e. because they always provide the city-dwellers with water and food, as we shall see later). Note: Rashi DH 'K'dei' seems to contradict his interpretation of the Kashya. In any event, it does not conform with the Gemara's conclusion.

(b) What the questioner means to ask is - what is the source for this concession. Seeing as it was instituted by the Anshei Keneses ha'Gedolah, it must at least be hinted in the Megilah itself.

(c) It cannot have been the later Chachamim who instituted those dates - because one Beis-Din cannot negate the words of another, unless it is greater than it both in knowledge and in numbers.

(d) Rav Sh'man bar Aba quoting Rebbi Yochanan learns the dates of the villagers from the Pasuk in Esther "Lekayem es Yemei ha'Purim ha'Eileh *bi'Z'maneihem*". "Z'maneihem" cannot come ...

1. ... for itself (because of the two days, the fourteenth and the fifteenth, on which the Megilah is read) - since for that, just the word "Z'man" would have sufficed.
2. ... to teach us that those who read on the fourteenth do not read on the fifteenth, and vice-versa - because for that, the Pasuk could have added a 'Mem' and written "Z'manam". From the extra 'Yud', we learn the two additional days on which the villagers may read the Megilah (as will be explained more elaborately shortly).
4)
(a) We know to give the villagers only those two days and no more - because "Z'maneihem" similar to "Z'manam" (which incorporates the fourteenth and the fifteenth). Just as "Z'manam" incorporates two days, so too, does "Z'maneihem".

(b) We do not require a Pasuk in order to give the villagers the thirteenth, because it is the time when everybody gathered to fight (both in Shushan and in all other places). Consequently, since the main miracle took place on that day, it is obvious that they may read it then, and the Pasuk is only needed for the eleventh and the twelfth. Note: The Rosh explains 'Z'man Kehilah la'Kol' to mean that it is a day when everyone gathers in order to fast, giving us the only reference in the whole Shas to Ta'anis Esther.

(c) We know too, that those two days are the eleventh and the twelfth of Adar, and not the sixteenth and the seventeenth - because the Pasuk in Megilah writes "ve'Lo Ya'avor", meaning that one is not permitted to pass the fifteenth (i.e. the Megilah cannot be read later than that, under any circumstances).

5)
(a) Rebbi Shmuel bar Nachmeini learns the two extra days of the villagers from the Pasuk in Esther "ka'Yamim Asher Nachu Bahem ha'Yehudim" - 'Yamim' "ka'Yamim", he says. Two extra days like the two original ones.

(b)

1. Rebbi Shmuel bar Nachmeini did not want to learn it from "Z'maneihem" (like Rav Sh'man bar Aba) - because he does not agree with the Derashah "Z'man" "Z'manam" "Z'maneihem".
2. Rav Sh'man bar Aba did not want to learn it from "*ka'Yamim* Asher Nachu Bahem ha'Yehudim" (like Rebbi Shmuel bar Nachmeini) - because, in his opinion, "ka'Yamim" refers to the future (that they will later celebrate the same days as they celebrated in the time of the miracle).
6)
(a) In the first Lashon, Rabah bar bar Chanah quoting Rebbi Yochanan establishes our Mishnah like Rebbi Akiva S'timta'ah - which means that Rebbi wrote may S'tam (nameless) Mishnahs which follow his opinion.

(b) It cannot refer to the fact that so many of the 'Stams' are learned by Rebbi Akiva's disciples (S'tam Mishnah like Rebbi Meir, S'tam Tosefta like Rebbi Nechemyah and S'tam Sifra like Rebbi Yehudah), and all, according to their Rebbe, Rebbi Akiva - because then, why are Rebbi Eliezer b'Rebbi Yossi and Rebbi Menachem b'Rebbi Yossi also referred to as S'timta'ah?

(c) Rabah bar bar Chanah concludes that the Rabbanan argue with Rebbi Akiva. In his opinion, they hold that the villagers are obligated to read the Megilah when everybody else reads it (because they do not agree with the above Derashos which give them the concession to read earlier).

7)
(a) Rebbi Yehudah (in a Beraisa in Ta'anis) maintains that nowadays, the villagers are obligated to Read the Megilah on the fourteenth - because, due either to the fact that Rosh Chodesh is fixed, or because they lived so far apart, that the messengers would not get to the far-flung places in time for Pesach (a reason that applied even in the times of the later Tana'im, who lived after the Churban), the poor would determine Pesach by counting thirty days after Purim. Consequently, should the villagers read the Megilah early, they will (begin and) end Pesach early, which means that they will eat Chametz on the last days of Pesach.

(b) We see from there, that in the days of the Chachamim, the villagers *were* permitted to read the Megilah on the eleventh, twelfth and thirteenth of Adar (a Kashya on Rabah bar bar Chanah quoting Rebbi Yochanan who maintained that according to the Chachamim, there was no such concession). The Rabbanan who lived in the original era referred to by Rebbi Yehudah must be the Chachamim (who lived before the time of Rebbi Akiva), and not Rebbi Akiva - because in the days of Rebbi Akiva, Rebbi Yehudah's reason already applied, and the early period that he is referring to is speaking about the days when it did not.

(c) In the second Lashon - Rabah bar bar Chanah quoting Rebbi Yochanan says that it is Rebbi Akiva exclusively who permits the villagers to read the Megilah early even nowadays, but the Rabbanan (who concur with Rebbi Yehudah) hold that nowadays, the concession no longer applies, due to the fact that the poor determine Pesach as being thirty days after Pesach, as we explained earlier according to Rebbi Yehudah.

2b---------------------------------------2b

Questions

8)

(a) Rebbi Yehudah (in a Mishnah later) restricts the concession of the villagers to places where they tend to go into town on Mondays and Thursdays, but not there where they do not. In any event, it is clear that, on principle, Rebbi Yehudah permitted the villagers to read the Megilah prematurely, even in *his* time - clashing with his previous statement (from the Beraisa in Ta'anis - that nowadays, the villagers are obligated to read the Megilah on the fourteenth.

(b) To resolve this discrepancy - Rav Ashi establishes the Beraisa (not like Rebbi Yehudah, but) like Rebbi Yossi b'Rebbi Yehudah.

(c) He did this - because he had already heard that some people establish it like Rebbi Yehudah and others, like Rebbi Yossi b'Rebbi Yehudah. So when he became aware of the discrepancy, he decided that the author had to be Rebbi Yossi b'Rebbi Yehudah.

9)
(a) The Pasuk in Esther explicitly writes that the towns read the Megilah on the fourteenth. We cannot possibly infer from there that the Mukafin do not read the Megilah at all, for two reasons: firstly, because they are Jews just as much as the townspeople - and secondly, because of the Pasuk in Esther "me'Hodu ve'Ad Kush", which implies that *all* Jews everywhere are included in the obligation.

(b) The Pasuk writes "Liheyos Osim es Yom Arba'ah-Asar ... ve'es Yom Chamishah-Asar. We know that the Mukafin do not ...

1. ... read the Megilah twice, both on the fourteenth and on the fifteenth - because of the word "ve'es", which breaks between the fourteenth and the fifteenth.
2. ... have a choice to read either on the fourteenth or on the fifteenth - because of the word "bi'Z'maneihem", suggesting that the time of one is not the same as the time of the other (i.e. the townspeople read the Megilah on the fourteenth, and the Mukafin, on the fifteenth) as we explained earlier.
3. ... Read it on the thirteenth - because it is logical to say that they read it on the same day as Shushan.
(c) The above Pasuk speaks about 'Asiyah' (the celebrations of Purim). We learn that the same applies to the 'Zechirah' (reading the Megilah) - from the Pasuk "ve'ha'Yamim ha'Eileh "Nizkarim ve'Na'asim*", comparing the one to the other.
10)
(a) Rebbi Yehoshua ben Korchah learns that cities surrounded by a wall from the time of *Achashveirosh* (and not necessarily from the time of Yehoshua bin Nun) read on the fifteenth - because he compares them to Shushan (which was in a similar situation).

(b) The Rabbanan learn from the 'Gezeirah-Shavah' "P'razi" "P'razi" - that, just like by Batei Arei Chomah, a walled city is determined by whether, or not, it had a wall around it in the times of *Yehoshua*, so it is by Megilah.

(c) The basis of their Machlokes - is that the Chachamim had the tradition of the 'Gezeirah-Shavah' of "P'razi" "P'razi", whereas Rebbi Yehoshua ben Korchah did not. Note: Megilas Esther seems to enjoy a unique status among the books of T'nach. Nowhere else to we find such a collection of Derashos relating Megilah to Torah (such as 'Gezeiros Shavos', as if it was Torah) as we find by it. This will recur again and again throughout the Masechta.

(d) The problem with Shushan, according to the Rabbanan - is that it neither has the Din of a town, nor that of a Mukaf.

11)
(a) According to the Rabbanan, we try to explain the Pasuk in Esther ...
1. ... "Medinah u'Medinah" - to differentiate between the Mukafin from the time of Yehoshua and all other towns.
2. ... "Ir va'Ir" - to differentiate between Shushan and other towns.
(b) In that case - how will Rebbi Yehoshua (who does not differentiate between Shushan and other towns) explain "Ir va'Ir"?

(c) Rebbi Yehoshua ben Korchah retorts however - that even according to the Rabbanan one could ask the same Kashya, since they have already learned the distinction between the Mukafin and the other towns from "P'razi" "P'razi", so just like we asked why *he* needed "Ir va'Ir", why do *they* need "Medinah u'Medinah"?

(d) He goes on to learn from "Medinah u'Medinah" (according to the Chachamim) or from "Ir va'Ir" (according to himself), the Halachah of Rebbi Yehoshua ben Levi - who says that any town or village that is close to a walled city or that can be seen together with it, reads the Megilah on the fifteenth, like the walled city.

12)
(a) A Mil (two thousand Amos) or less - is considered close in this regard.

(b) Rebbi Yirmiyah (or Rebbi Chiya bar Aba) give the Shiur as 'from Chamsan till Teveryah' - to teach us that that *that* is the Shiur of a Mil.

Next daf

Index


For further information on
subscriptions, archives and sponsorships,
contact Kollel Iyun Hadaf,
daf@shemayisrael.co.il