POINT BY POINT SUMMARY
Prepared by Rabbi P. Feldman of Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
Ask A Question on the daf
Previous daf
Kidushin 49
KIDUSHIN 49-50 - sponsored by a generous grant from an anonymous donor. Kollel Iyun Hadaf is indebted to him for his encouragement and support and prays that Hashem will repay him in kind.
|
1) MAKING A SUGGESTION
(a) (Abaye): R. Shimon, R. Shimon ben Gamliel and R. Eliezer
all hold that a person (sometimes) is not insistent that
his words be fulfilled exactly, rather he makes a
suggestion.
(b) R. Shimon - in our Mishnah; R. Shimon ben Gamliel - in
the following Mishnah.
1. (Mishnah): A normal Get - the witnesses sign on the
front; a tied Get - the witnesses sign on the back.
If they signed on the wrong side (by either Get), it
is invalid;
i. R. Chanina ben Gamliel says, if they signed on
the front of a tied Get, it is valid, because
it can be untied and made into a regular Get.
ii. R. Shimon ben Gamliel says, everything is as
the local custom.
2. Question: Does the first Tana argue on this?!
3. Answer (Rav Ashi): If there is a standard custom in
that locale (which type of Get is used), all agree,
when a man authorizes a Get, he is insistent that it
be as the custom (so if the scribe deviated, it is
invalid);
i. They argue when both types of Gitin are used in
the area, and the husband asked for a regular
Get, and the scribe wrote a tied Get.
ii. The first Tana holds, he is insistent; R.
Shimon ben Gamliel holds, he merely suggests
that a regular Get is also fine.
(c) R. Eliezer - in the following Mishnah.
1. (Mishnah): A woman told an agent 'Receive my Get in
the place Peloni'; he received it somewhere else -
it is invalid;
2. R. Eliezer says, it is valid.
i. R. Eliezer holds she merely suggested that her
husband can probably be found in Peloni.
2) THE ARGUMENT IN OUR MISHNAH
(a) (Ula): R. Shimon and Chachamim only argue when he gave
her something worth more than what he said - but if his
lineage is better than he said, all agree she is not
Mekudeshes.
(b) Support (Rav Ashi - the next Mishnah): 'On condition that
I am a Kohen, and he was found to be a Levi', or
vice-versa; 'On condition that I am a Nasin, and he was
found to be a Mamzer', or vice-versa - she is not
Mekudeshes;
1. R. Shimon does not argue!
(c) Question (Mar bar Rav Ashi): But that Mishnah also says
'On condition that I have a Megudeles (adult) daughter or
Shifchah', and he does not have, or vice-versa - (the
Shifchah) is a case of monetary value, surely R. Shimon
argues!
1. Rather, we must say that once R. Shimon argued in
our Mishnah, we understand that he argues in the
next Mishnah;
2. We can say the same regarding mistaken lineage!
(d) Answer #1: The comparison is faulty!
1. By mistakes in monetary value, since he argued in
our Mishnah, surely he argues in the next Mishnah;
2. If he also argues by mistaken lineage, the Mishnah
must teach this!
(e) Answer #2: The case of the Shifchah is also a case of
mistaken lineage - 'Megudeles' means she is esteemed
(Rashi; Tosfos - a hairdresser) - such a slave can spread
stories about her master's wife!
3) HOW MUCH IS EXPECTED?
(a) 'On condition that I am a Karaina (reader of the Torah in
synagogue)' - if he has read 3 verses of the Torah for
the congregation, she is Mekudeshes;
1. R. Yehudah says, he must read and translate 3
verses.
2. Question: A person must not give his own
translation!
i. (Beraisa - R. Yehudah): One who translates a
verse according to the simple meaning of the
words, he is a falsifier; one who adds on, he
blasphemes!
3. Answer: He means, he says the received translation
(of Unkeles).
(b) If he said 'On condition that I am a Kara', she is
Mekudeshes only if he is proficient at reading all of
written Torah.
(c) (Chizkiyah): 'On condition that I Shoneh (learn Mishnah)'
- he must learn laws;
(d) (R. Yochanan): He must learn Torah.
(e) Question (Beraisa - R. Meir): Mishnah - this is laws; R.
Yehudah says, this is Medrash.
49b---------------------------------------49b
(f) Answer: When R. Yochanan said, he must learn Torah, he
meant Medrash (expositions of) Torah.
1. This is only when he said "I learn" - but if he said
'on condition that I am a Tana', he must be able to
recite laws, Sifra, Sifri, and Tosefta.
(g) 'On condition that I am a Talmid' - he need not be as
great as ben Azai, it suffices that he knows something
well enough that he can be answer questions on it, even
tractate 'Kalah'.
(h) 'On condition that I am a Chacham' he need not be like
Chachamim of Yavneh, like R. Akiva and his colleagues;
1. It suffices that he can answer a question based on
reasoning, in any place.
(i) 'On condition that I am mighty' - he need not be as Avner
or Yo'av, rather it suffices that people fear him.
(j) 'On condition that I am rich' - he need not be as rich as
R. Eliezer ben Charsom or R. Eliezer ben Azaryah;
1. It suffices that he is honored in his city as a rich
man.
(k) 'On condition that I am a Tzadik' - even if he is an
absolute Rasha, she is Mekudeshes, perhaps he repented in
his heart.
(l) 'On condition that I am a Rasha - even if he is a perfect
Tzadik, she is Mekudeshes, perhaps he served idolatry in
his heart.
4) GIFTS SHARED AMONG THE WORLD
(a) Ten measures of Chochmah came to the world - Eretz
Yisrael received 9, the rest of the world, 1.
(b) Ten measures of beauty came to the world - Yerushalayim
received 9, the rest of the world, 1.
(c) Ten measures of wealth came to the world - Romi received
9, the rest of the world, 1.
(d) Ten measures of poverty came to the world - Bavel
received 9, the rest of the world, 1.
(e) Ten measures of haughtiness came to the world - Eilam
received 9, the rest of the world, 1.
1. Question: But haughtiness descended to Bavel!
i. "Two women...wind in their wings...they carried
the Eifah between the ground and Heaven...they
are carrying it to Shinar (Bavel) to build for
it a house."
ii. (R. Yochanan): They were carrying flattery and
haughtiness, which descended to Bavel.
2. Answer: Indeed, it descended to Bavel; from Bavel, 9
tenths went to Eilam.
i. Support: "To build for it a house" (only for
flattery, not for haughtiness).
(f) Objection: But it was taught, poverty is a sign of
haughtiness - and poverty is in Bavel!
(g) Answer: The poverty referred to is poverty in Torah.
1. (R. Yochanan): "We have a young sister, she has no
breasts" - this is Eilam, that merited to learn
Torah, not to teach it.
(h) Ten measures of strength came to the world - the Persians
received 9;
(i) Ten measures of lice came to the world - Madai received
9;
(j) Ten measures of witchcraft came to the world - Mitzrayim
received 9;
(k) Ten measures of plagues came to the world - pigs received
9;
(l) Ten measures of lewdness came to the world - Araviya
received 9;
(m) Ten measures of brazenness came to the world - Meishan
received 9;
(n) Ten measures of speech came to the world - women received
9;
(o) Ten measures of drunkenness came to the world - Kushim
received 9;
(p) Ten measures of sleep came to the world - slaves received
9, the rest of the world, 1.
Next daf
|