Previous daf

1)

(a) What do we learn from the Pasuk in Ki Seitzei "Kedei Rish'aso"?

(b) The Mishnah in Makos, lists a number of Arayos who receive Malkos (a sister, a father's or mother's sister ... ).
Why does this now pose a Kashya on our Mishnah ('Eilu Na'aros she'Yesh Lahen K'nas')?

(a) What does Ula hold when it is a question of Mamon versus Malkos?

(b) How does he distinguish between the two Mishnos in order to resolve the contradiction between them?

(c) Ula has established the Mishnah in Makos by a Bogeres.
How does he solve the problem regarding ...

1. ... Boshes u'P'gam?
2. ... Tza'ar (none of which are K'nas, in which case, the rapist must pay a Bogeres too)?

(d) How do we then establish the Mishnah in Makos even by a Na'arah?

(a) How do we try to learn Ula's principle from every case of Chovel ba'Chaveiro?

(b) From where do we learn that Chovel ba'Chaveiro is subject to Malkos?

(c) Is Mamon stricter than Chovel ba'Chaveiro or more lenient than it?

(d) Why can we not learn Mamon from Chovel ba'Chaveiro, assuming that Mamon is ...

1. ... more stringent?
2. ... more lenient?

(a) Which other case do we attempt to use as Ula's source?

(b) We also try to learn Ula's Din from Eidim Zomemin.
From where do we learn that Eidim Zomemin are subject to ...

1. ... Mamon (even if they have been warned)?
2. ... Malkos (even when "Ka'asher Zamam" is not applicable)?

(c) Is Mamon stricter than Eidim Zomemin or more lenient?

(d) Why can we not learn Mamon from Eidim Zomemin assuming that Mamon is ...

1. ... more stringent than them?
2. ... more lenient?

(a) Why can we not even learn Mamon from the 'Tzad ha'Shaveh' (the combination) of Chovel ba'Chaveiro and Eidim Zomemin (see Tosfos DH 'she'Kein')?

(b) So Ula ultimately learns his principle from the 'Gezeirah-Shavah' "Tachas" (Asher Inah) "Tachas".
In which connection is the second "Tachas" written?

6)

(a) In the opinion of Rebbi Yochanan, whenever there is a question of Mamon versus Malkos, the rule is 'Milka Laki, Mamona Lo Meshalem'.
How does he then differentiate between our Mishnah (which obligates the rapist to pay), and the Mishnah in Makos (which is Mechayev him Malkos)?

(b) What then, is the Machlokes between Ula and Rebbi Yochanan ...

1. ... in our Mishnah (which, both agree, speaks about a Na'arah)?
2. ... in the Mishnah in Makos?

(c) Rebbi Yochanan, like Ula, learns that one can only receive one punishment from "Kedei Rish'aso".
Which Pasuk does the Torah juxtapose next to this one that serves as his source to give Malkos precedence?

(a) We ask on Rebbi Yochanan from Chovel ba'Chaveiro, where the culprit is sentenced to pay, and not to receive Malkos. How do we initially try to establish that ruling, that would vindicate Rebbi Yochanan?

(b) Rebbi Ami Amar Rebbi Yochanan states that if Reuven strikes Shimon without creating a wound worth a P'rutah, he receives Malkos.
How do we use this statement to refute the previous contention? How do we know that Rebbi Yochanan is speaking when the culprit was warned?

(c) We resolve the problem from Chovel ba'Chaveiro with a statement by Rebbi Ila'a regarding Eidim Zomemin.
Which statement?

(a) Rebbi Meir says that if Eidim Zomemin attempt to obligate someone to pay two hundred Zuz, they are sentenced to pay two hundred Zuz in addition to receiving Malkos.
Why is that?

(b) What do the Chachamim say?

(c) What does Rebbi Ila'a learn from the Pasuk in Shoftim (in connection with Eidim Zomemin) "Yad be'Yad"?

(d) And what does Rebbi Yochanan learn from the Pasuk in Emor "Ka'asher Asah Kein Yea's Lo ... Kein Yinasen Bo"?

Next daf