POINT BY POINT SUMMARY
Prepared by P. Feldman of Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
Ask A Question on the daf
Previous daf
Kesuvos 85
1) SEIZURE BY CREDITORS
(a) Rav Papa and Rav Huna Brei d'Rav Yehoshua seized the
boat. Rav Papa conducted it with oars; Rav Huna Brei
d'Rav Yehoshua was leading it by the ropes; each said
that he acquired it himself.
(b) Rav Pinchus Bar Ami: But Rav and Shmuel say, seizure only
helps in a public domain!
(c) Rav Papa and Rav Huna Brei d'Rav Yehoshua: We seized the
boat in the middle of the river, which is as a public
domain.
(d) Rava: You are stealing! Rav Nachman ruled, seizure only
works in the borrower's lifetime!
(e) Avimi, son of R. Avahu owed money. He sent Chama Brei
d'Rabah Bar Avahu to pay it. After paying, he asked for
the document; the creditors refused, saying that they
took the money for an oral loan.
1. R. Avahu (to Chama): Do you have witnesses that saw
you pay?
2. Chama: No.
3. R. Avahu: If so, Since they could say you didn't
pay, they are believed to say they took payment for
an oral loan.
(f) Question: Must the messenger suffer the loss?
(g) Answer (Rav Ashi): If he was told, take the document and
give the money, he suffers the loss; if he was told, give
the money and take the document, he is exempt.
(h) Rejection: No, in either case, he suffers the loss.
1. The borrower tells him, "I sent you to help me, not
to mess me up"!
(i) A man had deposited documents by a woman he owed money
to. After his death, his heirs requested the documents.
1. The woman: I seized them when he was alive, as
collateral for my debt.
2. Rav Nachman: Do you have witnesses that he asked for
his documents, and you refused to return them?
3. The woman: No.
4. Rav Nachman: If so, this is considered seizure after
death, and it does not help.
2) ON WHOM MAY A JUDGE RELY
(a) Rava judged a case, and ruled that the defendant must
swear.
1. Rava's wife: I know that she is suspected to swear
falsely!
(b) Rava changed his ruling, and said that the claimant will
swear.
(c) Rava judged a case involving a document. Rav Papa told
Rava that he knew that the document had been paid.
1. Rava: Do you have someone else that knows this?
2. Rav Papa: No.
3. Rava: If so, you are only 1 witness, your testimony
does not help.
4. Rav Ada Bar Masna: Is Rav Papa less credible than
your wife?!
5. Rava: I know my wife would not lie; I do not know
about Rav Papa.
(d) Rav Papa: Now that you say that a judge may rely on
someone that he knows does not lie, someone as my son Aba
Mar, I would tear a document on his word.
(e) Question: Can that really be?!
(f) Correction: Rather, I will not allow one to collect with
it (Tosfos - without swearing).
3) A SEEMINGLY FALSE MATTER
(a) Rav Bivi Bar Abaye ruled that a certain woman must swear
to avoid paying. The claimant requested that she swear in
her home city - perhaps she would be ashamed to swear
falsely there.
1. The woman: First write for me a document saying that
I swore and was acquitted.
2. Rav Bivi: Write it for her.
3. Objection (Rav Papi): But Rava said, if a
confirmation of a document is written before the
witnesses affirm the signatures, it is invalid!
i. A matter which appears false is invalid - here
also (we cannot write that she swore before she
swears)!
4. Rejection: From Rav Nachman, we see that Rav Papi is
wrong.
5. (Rav Nachman): R. Meir used to say, if a man finds a
Get in the trash with the proper names, if he told
witnesses to sign it and gave it to his wife, she is
divorced.
6. Chachamim only argue because they say that a Get
must be written with intent for the man and woman -
but they agree by other documents!
i. (Rav Asi): A document that was paid up may not
be used for another loan, because its power to
obligate payment had been pardoned.
ii. If not for this, it could be used - we are not
concerned for the appearance of falsity!
85b---------------------------------------85b
4) JUDGMENTS BASED ON ESTIMATION
(a) A man deposited 7 pearls, wrapped in a garment, by R.
Miyasha; R. Miyasha died, without leaving any
instructions.
1. R. Ami: (We believe the man that claims to have
deposited them). Firstly, R. Miyasha is not
estimated to be rich. Secondly, the man has an
identifying sign.
i. This only applies if the depositor is not
frequent in the house; if he is, we are
concerned that another man deposited them, and
this man saw them there.
(b) A man deposited a gold cup by Chasa. Chasa died, without
leaving any instructions.
1. Rav Nachman: I know that Chasa is not rich. Also,
the man has an identifying sign.
i. This only applies if the depositor is not
frequent in the house; if he is, we are
concerned that another man deposited it, and
this man saw it there.
(c) A man deposited a silk garment by Rav Dimi. Rav Dimi
died, without leaving any instructions.
1. R. Aba: I know that Rav Dimi is not rich. Also, the
man has an identifying sign.
i. This only applies if the depositor is not
frequent in the house; if he is, we are
concerned that another man deposited it, and
this man saw it there.
(d) A (dying) man said, 'My property should go to Tuvya'.
After he died, Tuvya showed up.
1. R. Yochanan: He gets the property.
(e) If he said, 'To Tuvya', and Rav Tuvya came - he said
Tuvya, not Rav Tuvya.
1. If he is frequent by Rav Tuvya, he would call him
Tuvya.
(f) If 2 men called Tuvya come, 1 is a neighbor, the other a
Chacham - the Chacham receives it.
1. If 1 is a relative, the other a Chacham - the
Chacham receives it.
(g) Question: Who comes first, a neighbor or a relative?
(h) Answer: "A close neighbor is better than a distant
brother".
(i) If both are Chachamim, both relatives, both neighbors -
the judge gives it as he sees fit.
5) PARDONING A SOLD DEBT
(a) (Rava): This that Shmuel said, one who sells a loan
document may pardon the debt; even the heir of the seller
may pardon it - but a woman that brought a loan document
into marriage, she cannot pardon the debt, since her
husband has an equal hand in her property.
(b) A relative of Rav Nachman sold her Kesuvah (the buyer
will collect it if she is widowed or divorced). She was
divorced, then died. The buyer came to collect from her
daughter (who inherited her).
1. Rav Nachman: Will no one counsel her to pardon her
father's obligation to pay her mother's Kesuvah (and
then she will inherit that money from her father)?
Next daf
|