REVIEW QUESTIONS ON GEMARA AND RASHI
prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Jerusalem
Previous daf
Eruvin 70
|
ERUVIN 70 - Dedicated by Gerald Ziering in honor the very special Rebbi that
his son is currently learning with, Rabbi Elimelech Kornfeld (brother of
Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld).
|
1)
Why does our Mishnah need to write 'Shenayim ... ve'Ein Notlin Reshus',
seeing as it has already written 'Hayu Shenayim, Osrin Zeh Al Zeh'?
2)
(a) Rabah told Abaye that a resident who is Mevatel his Reshus needs to do
so to each resident independently, and that it will not suffice to be
Mevatel Reshus to just one of them.
What is the problem with this from the
Beraisa, which states 'Echad she'Lo Erav Nosen Reshuso le'Echad she'Erav'?
(b) Rabah establishes this case when the third person died. Then how will
he explain the Seifa, which states 'Aval Ein Echad she'Erav Nosen Reshuso
le'Echad she'Lo Erav'? If the third person died, why not?
(c) What is the proof for Rabah from the following case (the Seifa
de'Reisha) 'u'Shenayim she'Irvu Nosnin Reshusan li'Shenayim she'Irvu'?
(d) Abaye refutes that proof by explaining 'li'Shenayim' to mean 'le'Echad
mi'Shenayim'.
How is Abaye's refutal rejected?
3)
(a) How does Abaye explain the Beraisa 'Echad she'Erav Nosen Reshuso
le'Echad she'Erav' (vis-a-vis the third person)?
(b) How will Rabah explain it, and what is the Chidush?
(c) 'Shenayim she'Irvu Nosnin Reshusan le'Echad she'Lo Erav'.
What is the
Chidush?
(d) 'Shenayim she'Lo Irvu, Nosnin Reshusan li'Shenayim she'Irvu'.
According
to Abaye, who learns that 'li'Shenayim means le'Echad mi'Shenayim' (and the
Beraisa already taught us - in his opinion - that Bitul Reshus is not
necessary to each one), what is the Chidush?
4)
What is the Chidush of ...
- ... 'Shenayim she'Lo Irvu, Nosnin Reshusan ... O le'Echad she'Lo Eirav'?
- ... 've'Ein Shenayim she'Irvu Mevatlin Reshusan li'Shenayim she'Lo Irvu'?
- ... 've'Ein Shenayim she'Lo Irvu, Nosnin Reshusan li'Shenayim she'Lo Irvu'?
Answers to questions
70b---------------------------------------70b
5)
(a) Rava asked Rav Nachman whether a Yoresh whose father died on Shabbos can
be Mevatel Reshus.
Why should he not be able to?
(b) Rav Nachman holds that he may.
Why?
6)
(a) The Beraisa lists the only exception to the rule that whatever is
forbidden for part of Shabbos remains forbidden for the whole of Shabbos as
Mevatel Reshuso ('Chutz mi'Mevatel Reshus') but does not add 'u'Veno'. This
seems to vindicate the Amora'im of Bei Shmuel, who disagree with Rav
Nachman.
How will Rav Nachman explain the Beraisa?
(b) Which case does the Beraisa refer to when it says 'Kol she'Mutar
le'Miktzas Shabbos, Hutar le'Chol ha'Shabbos'?
(c) From 'Zeh ha'Klal, we include even if the Lechi or the Koreh fell.
Why
can we not know this from the previous case?
7)
(a) And which case does the Beraisa refer to when it says 'Kol she'Ne'esar
le'Miktzas Shabbos, Ne'esar le'Chol ha'Shabbos'?
(b) Zeh ha'Klal here comes to include a case when the gentile who shared the
Chatzer with other Jewish residents, died.
Why is this not included in the
previous case?
8)
(a) What will the Din be if someone from the Chatzer died, having bequeathed
his Reshus to someone who lived outside the Chatzer ...
- ... *before* Shabbos?
- ... *after* Shabbos had already come in?
(b) What will be the Din if someone from outside the Chazter, who had owned
a section of the Chatzer, died, having bequeathed that section to a resident
of the Chatzer ...
- ... *before* Shabbos?
- ... *after* Shabbos had already come in?
(c) How does Rav Nachman, interpret 'Oser' (in the latter case)? Why should
he not have the option of being Mevatel Reshuso?
Answers to questions
Next daf
|