Previous daf

1)

(a) Now that the Tana Kama learns Havdalah from "u''Malak Ve'hiktir", why does he need 'Vehikrivo" to avoid learning from Chatas ha'Of?

(b) Had he learned 'ke'Mishpat Chatas ha'Of", how would he have explained "u'Malak Ve'hiktir"?

(c) Now that the Torah does write "Ve'hikrivo", from where does the Tana Kama learn the Din of bringing the Olas ha'Of on the upper half of the Mizbe'ach?

(a) What does Rav Chisda learn from the Pasuk in Acharei -Mos "Ve'hikriv Aharon es Par ha'Chatas *Asher Lo*", which is written twice?

(b) And what do we learn from the Pasuk there "Ki ba'Yom ha'Zeh Yechaper Aleichem" (bearing in mind that the Pasuk also mentions "Etzba" and "Kehunah")?

(c) What do we learn from the Pasuk in Tzav "be'Yom Tzavoso"?

(d) Bearing in mind that the Torah writes in Vayikra (in connection with a Nidvas Olas ha'Of) "Ve'hikriv *ha'Kohen*", why does the Tana Kama of the previous Beraisa then need to learn 'the right hand' by Olas ha'Of, from "ka'Mishpat" ('ke'Mishpat Chatas Beheimah')?

(a) What does Rabah bar bar Chanah Amar Resh Lakish learn from the Pasuk in Metzora "Ve'taval ha'Kohen es Etzba'o ha'Yemanis"?

(b) In that case, why does the Tana Kama need to learn it from "ka'Mishpat"?

(c) Rebbi Yishmael learns 'Mul Oref' by Olas ha'Of from "ka'Mishpat" ('ke'Mishpat Chatas ha'Of').
What problem do we now have with the Tana Kama and Rebbi Elazar b'Rebbi Shimon?

(d) So from where do *they* learn it?

(a) What does our Mishnah say about the eligibity of pigeons and young doves?

(b) 'Techilas ha'Tzihuv' however, is Pasul by both.
What is 'Techilas ha'Tzihuv'?

(c) What is the reason for this ruling?

(a) What does the Beraisa mean when it says 'Torim Gedolim ... b'nei Yonah Ketanim'?

(b) What would we have said had the Torah not written ...

1. ... "Torim"?
2. ... "b'nei Yonah"?

6)

(a) From where does Rava learn that young pigeons and older doves are Pasul?

(b) How do we refute the suggestion that perhaps "b'nei Yonah" means younger doves, whereas ''Torim" implies young pigeons as well as older ones?

(c) What does the Beraisa learn from the Pasuk "min ha'Torim" and "min b'nei ha'Yonah"?

(d) What would we otherwise have said?

(a) Ya'akov Korchah cites a Beraisa which gives the age when b'nei Yonah are Kasher as 'mi'she'Ye'alelu', which he explains with the Pasuk in Iyov "Efrochav Ye'alelu Dam".
How does Abaye interpret this?

(b) In any event, Ya'akov Korcha's D'rashah implies that until they reach that stage, they are Pasul.
Why is that?

(a) Rebbi Zeira asked what the Din will be if someone undertakes to bring an Olah consisting of Torim or b'nei Yonah, and he brings one of each that had reached the stage of Techilas ha'Tzihuv.
What are the two sides of the She'eilah? Why will the Noder ...

1. ... have fulfilled his obligation?
2. ... not have fulfilled his obligation?

(b) How does Rava attempt to resolve the She'eilah from the Beraisa 'P'rat li'Techilas ha'Tzihuv she'Bazeh ve'she'Bazeh'? What is the problem with this D'rashah, according to one of the sides of the She'eilah?

(c) Why, on the other hand, is the D'rashah acceptable according to the other side?

Next daf