POINT BY POINT SUMMARY
Prepared by Rabbi P. Feldman of Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
Ask A Question on the daf
Previous daf
Chulin 93
CHULIN 92-95 - Sponsored by a generous grant from an anonymous donor.
Kollel Iyun Hadaf is indebted to him for his encouragement and support and
prays that Hashem will repay him in kind.
|
1) WHICH "CHELEV" IS FORBIDDEN?
(a) (Rav Asi): Strands of Chelev are forbidden, but one is
not Chayav Kares for eating them;
1. Strands of Chelev in the kidney are forbidden, but
one is not Chayav Kares for eating them;
(b) Rebbi and R. Chiya argue whether or not Chelev in the
groove in the kidney is forbidden.
1. Rabah and R. Yochanan would dig all of it out; Rav
Asi would only remove what covers the kidney.
(c) (Abaye): Presumably, Rav Asi is correct, for R. Aba
taught that Chelev which is covered by flesh is
permitted;
1. This is because the Torah forbids Chelev *on* the
flanks, not in the flanks;
2. Similarly, it forbids Chelev *on* the kidney, not in
the kidney.
(d) (R. Aba citing Shmuel): Chelev which is covered by flesh
is permitted.
(e) Contradiction: But Rav Asi cited Shmuel to say that
Chelev under the loins is forbidden!
(f) Answer (Abaye): When an animal walks, that Chelev becomes
exposed.
(g) (R. Aba): One is Chayav Kares for eating Chelev on the
Masas or on the Beis ha'Kosos -this is the Chelev on the
Kerev (innards.)
(h) (R. Aba): If one eats Chelev of the hip he is Chayav
Kares - this is the Chelev on the flanks.
(i) (R. Aba): Strands in the foreleg are forbidden.
(j) Objection (Rav Safra): Did the Torah forbid all meat?!
(k) Counter-question (Rava): Did the Torah permit blood?!
1. Rather, after cutting them and salting them, the
strands may even be cooked in a pot (no blood
remains.)
(l) (Rav Yehudah): One must scrape off the Chelev from the
first Amah of the small intestine (after the stomach) -
this is the Chelev on the small intestines.
(m) (Rav Yehudah): Strands in the flanks are forbidden.
1. There are five forbidden strands, three on the right
side of the animal, two on the left.
2. Three of them branch off into two smaller branches
(each), two of them branch off into three smaller
branches (each.)
i. This is important to know regarding digging
them out.
ii. If they are removed when the meat is warm, they
come out intact; if not, one must dig them out.
(n) (Abaye): There are five forbidden strands - three are
forbidden on account of Chelev, two on account of blood.
1. Strands in the spleen, loins and kidney are
forbidden on account of Chelev; of the foreleg and
jaw are on account of blood.
(o) Rav Yehudah bar Oshaya was peeling the Chelev off the top
of the spleen for Levi, the son of Rav Huna bar Chiya.
1. Levi: You must also peel lower on the spleen!
2. R. Oshiya: Rav said, only the Chelev on the thick
part is forbidden.
3. Question (Rav Yehudah bar Oshiya): But Rav Hamnuna
taught, the layer covering the spleen is forbidden,
but one is not liable for eating it!
i. Question: To which Chelev on the spleen does he
refer?
ii. He does not mean the Chelev on the thick part -
one is liable for it!
iii. Answer: Rather, he refers to the Chelev on the
rest of it.
4. R. Oshiya: If he said so, I accept it.
(p) (Rav Hamnuna) The layer covering the spleen is forbidden,
but one is not liable for eating it;
1. The layer covering the kidney is forbidden, but one
is not liable for eating it.
(q) Question (Beraisa): One is liable for them.
(r) Answer: One is liable for the Chelev on the thick part of
the spleen, not on the rest; one is liable for the top
layer of Chelev on the kidneys, not the bottom layer.
2) "BEITZIM"
(a) (R. Ami or Rav Asi): If Beitzim are barely connected,
they are forbidden;
(b) (The other of R. Ami and Rav Asi): They are permitted.
1. The first opinion says, since they will never heal,
it is as if they fell off, they are forbidden like
Ever Min ha'Chai;
93b---------------------------------------93b
2. The second opinion permits - since they do not
decay, this shows that they are alive.
i. The first opinion says that they do not decay
because they are not exposed to air.
ii. The second opinion says that they do not heal
due to weakness.
(c) R. Yochanan (to R. Shimon bar Aba): They are permitted,
but you should not eat them - "Do not abandon the Torah
of your mother".
(d) (Mar bar Rav Ashi): Beitzim of a kid:
1. If it was less than one month old, the covering need
not be peeled off;
2. If it was over one month, they are forbidden if
there is semen inside, if not they are permitted.
3. Question: How does one know if there is semen
inside?
4. Answer: If inside there are red streaks, they are
forbidden; if not, they are permitted.
(e) Everywhere that Rav Acha and Ravina argue, Ravina is
lenient, Rav Acha is stringent, with only three
exceptions, raw meat, Beitzim, and veins;
1. The Halachah always follows the lenient opinion.
(f) If raw meat is very red:
1. If it is cut and salted, it may even be cooked in a
pot.
2. Alternatively, it suffices to roast it on a spit,
for the blood will exude.
3. If the meat is over coals - Rav Acha is lenient,
Ravina is stringent.
i. Rav Acha says that the coals help draw out the
blood; Ravina says, they cause the blood to
stay inside.
4. They argue similarly regarding Beitzim and veins.
3) WHEN BLOOD FLOWS OUT
(a) Version #1: If the head of an animal is rinsed and
covered in hot ashes:
1. If the neck faces down, the blood will flow out, the
head is permitted;
2. If the head rests on its side (the jaw), the blood
will congeal, the head is forbidden.
3. If the nostrils face down:
i. If they are propped open, the head is
permitted; if not, it is forbidden.
(b) Version #2: If the neck or nostrils face down, the blood
will flow out, the head is permitted;
1. If the head rests on its side:
i. If the nostrils propped open, the head is
permitted; if not, it is forbidden.
4) WHICH "GID" IS FORBIDDEN
(a) (Rav Yehudah): There are two Gidim - the inner one (near
the bone) is forbidden, one is liable for eating it;
1. The outer one is enveloped in flesh, it is
forbidden, but one who eats it is exempt.
(b) Question (Beraisa): The inner Gid is near the flesh.
(c) Answer (Rav Acha): It starts by the bone, and makes its
way to the flesh.
(d) Question (Beraisa): The outer Gid is by the bone.
(e) Answer (Rav Yehudah): In the place where butchers cut off
the tail, there it is close to the bone.
5) CAN BUTCHERS BE TRUSTED?
(a) (Rav Yehudah): If a butcher removed the Chelev but left
over k'Se'orah (the size of a barley seed), he is
punished;
(b) (R. Yochanan): If he left over a k'Zayis of Chelev, he is
punished.
(c) (Rav Papa): They do not argue - if he leaves over
k'Se'orah, he is removed from his job; if he left over
k'Zayis, he is also lashed.
1. (Mar Zutra): The k'Se'orah must be in one place, but
the k'Zayis may be spread over several places.
2. The Halachah follows Rav Papa.
(d) Version #1 (Mishnah - R. Meir): A butcher is not believed
(e) (R. Chiya bar Aba): (At first, they said that the
Halachah follows R. Meir;) they retracted to say that he
is believed (for the Halachah follows Chachamim.).
(f) Question (Rav Nachman): Are people really more reliable
than in previous generations?!
(g) Answer: No - originally, Rabanan thought that the
Halachah follows R. Meir, that one must dig out the Gid,
therefore, a butcher is not believed;
1. Later, they retracted to say that the Halachah
follows R. Yehudah, one need not dig out the Gid,
therefore a butcher is believed.
(h) Version #2 (Mishnah - Chachamim): A butcher is believed
regarding the Gid and Chelev.
(i) (R. Chiya bar Aba): They later retracted to say that he
is not believed.
(j) (Rav Nachman): Nowadays, a butcher is believed.
(k) Question: Are people really more reliable than the
previous generation?!
(l) Answer: No - originally, Rabanan thought that the
Halachah follows R. Yehudah, that one need not dig out
the Gid, and butchers are believed;
1. Later, they retracted to say that the Halachah
follows R. Meir, one must dig out the Gid. People
were not used to digging it out, and would sometimes
forget, so a butcher cannot be believed.
2. By the time of Rav Nachman, everyone was used to
digging it out, no one forgot, so butchers were
again believed.
(m) (Mishnah): ...And they are believed regarding Chelev.
(n) Question: The first Tana never mentioned Chelev!
(o) Answer: Indeed, the first Tana does not believe butchers
about the Gid or Chelev; Chachamim believe them about
both.
Next daf
|