POINT BY POINT SUMMARY
Prepared by Rabbi P. Feldman of Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
Ask A Question on the daf
Previous daf
Chulin 62
CHULIN 61-63 - sponsored by Dr. Lindsay A. Rosenwald of Lawrence NY, in
honor of his father, David ben Aharon ha'Levy Rosenwald of blessed memory.
|
1) HOW TO KNOW THAT A BIRD IS "TAHOR"
(a) (Rav Nachman): If one who recognizes the Tamei species
finds a bird that has a Siman (and knows it is not from
the Tamei species), it is permitted;
(b) One who does not that recognize the Tamei species:
1. If the bird has one Siman, he may not eat it;
2. If it has two Simanim and he knows that it is not a
raven, it is permitted.
3. Question: Are we concerned only for ravens?!
i. (Beraisa - R. Eliezer): "The raven, l'Minehu
(and its related species)" - this includes the
Zarzir (starling); it also includes the white
Sanunis (swallow).
ii. Chachamim: But people of Timrasa eat Zarzir,
because it has a crop; and people of Galil eat
white Sanunis, because its stomach can be
peeled!
iii. R. Eliezer: They will ultimately be punished
for this.
4. Answer: Rather, he must know that it is not a raven,
nor a related species.
(c) (Ameimar): The law is, if a bird has a Siman, it is
assumed to be Tahor, like long like we do not see it
Dores (Rashi; Tosfos - if the Siman is that it is not
Dores.)
(d) Rav Ashi: This argues with Rav Nachman!
(e) Ameimar: Yes! The only Tamei species that is not Dores is
Peres or Ozniyah - these are not found in settled areas,
we are not concerned for it.
(f) (Rav Yehudah): A bird that scratches - this is the white
Sanunis that R. Eliezer and Chachamim argued on; it may
be used for Taharas Metzora.
(g) Version #1 (Ameimar): If the stomach is white, all agree
that it is permitted;
1. They argue when the stomach is green - R. Eliezer
forbids, Chachamim permit; the Halachah follows R.
Eliezer.
(h) Version #2 (Mar Zutra): If the stomach is green, all
agree that it is forbidden;
1. They argue when the stomach is white - R. Eliezer
forbids, Chachamim permit; the Halachah follows
Chachamim. (End of Version #2)
(i) According to Mar Zutra, they argue when the stomach is
white - we understand R. Eliezer in the Beraisa, "The
raven, l'Mino" - this includes the white Sanunis.
(j) Question: According to Ameimar, all agree that if the
stomach is white, it is permitted - what does R. Eliezer
forbid in the Beraisa?
(k) Answer: He forbids it when the stomach is red;
1. He calls it white to show that he does not refer to
the species that dwells in houses, which is black
(R. Gershom - all forbid that species.)
2) SPECIES OF "TORIM" AND DOVES
(a) (Rachbah): *Tasil* is a species of dove, it is not a Tor
(therefore, it is acceptable for a Korban only when it is
young);
1. Atzifi and Torim of Rachbah (kinds of turtle-doves)
are species of Torim, not of doves (they are
acceptable for Korbanos only when they are old.)
(b) Question (Rav Daniel bar Rav Katina - Mishnah): Any bird
that drinks from Mei Chatas (water Mekudash with ashes of
the Parah Adumah) disqualifies it, except for a dove,
since doves suck the water (and do not return it.)
62b---------------------------------------62b
1. If Tasil is also a species of dove, the Mishnah
should also mention that Tasil does not disqualify
the water!
(c) Answer (R. Zeira): Tasil sucks the water and returns it
(disqualifying the rest); doves suck the water and do not
return it.
(d) (Rav Yehudah): Kufshani (turtle-doves) of Tzutzaini are
the Torim of Rachbah; they are valid for Korbanos.
(e) Question (Mishnah): "Hyssop" (may be used for the Parah
Adumah), not the following hyssops:
1. Of Yavan; blue hyssop (Aruch; Rambam - hyssop of
Kuchli); of Romi; wild hyssop; any hyssop with an
accompanying name. (Likewise, Torim of Rachbah
should be invalid!)
(f) Answer #1 (Abaye): An accompanying name only disqualifies
if that name existed when the Torah was given.
1. By specifying the generic name, the Torah
disqualified all other varieties.
2. The other name for Torim arose after the Torah was
given.
(g) Answer #2 (Rava): In Tzutzaini, Kufshani of Tzutzaini are
simply called Torim.
3) OTHER SPECIES
(a) (Rav Yehudah): Karzei (Rashi - locusts; Tosfos - very
small birds) found in nettles (a small plant) are
permitted; those found in cabbage are forbidden.
(b) (Ravina): If one eats the latter he is lashed, for they
are Sheretz ha'Of (flying swarming creatures.)
(c) (Rav Yehudah): Tzarda is permitted; Barda is forbidden;
Marda is doubtful. (These are types of birds.)
(d) (Rav Asi): We are in doubt about eight birds - Chuva,
Chuga, Suga, Harnuga, Tushlami, Marda, Kuchilna, and Bar
Nafcha. (A possible translation of them, in order -
Baillon's crake, spotted crake, a type of Chuva, corn
orake, water rail, purple gallinula, a bird similar to
Marda, moorhen.)
1. One Siman is that the stomach can be peeled - in
these birds, it can be peeled only with a knife, not
by hand.
2. Question: But Shmuel had a (dead) goose whose
stomach could not be peeled; after it was in the sun
for a while, it could be peeled! (Even though the
stomach is too hard to be peeled, this is not a
Siman of Tum'ah!)
3. Answer: In these birds, even after the stomach
softens, it cannot be peeled by hand.
(e) (Abaye): Marda (one of the eight doubtful birds) is the
rooster of the swamp.
(f) (Rav Papa): The rooster of the swamp is forbidden; the
hen of the swamp (a different species) is permitted.
(g) (Mereimar): Chachamim subsequently saw the hen of the
swamp Dores; they forbade it.
(h) (The identity of many of the following birds is unclear.)
(i) (Rav): Shevor Andrafta is permitted; Piruz Andrafta is
forbidden.
(j) (Rav Huna): Bunya is permitted; Parva is forbidden.
(k) (Rav Papa): Mardu Zagid v'Achil is permitted; Sagid
v'Achil is forbidden.
(l) (Shmuel): Shasya Chamra and Mazga Chamra are forbidden;
bas Mazga Chamra is permitted.
(m) (Rav Yehudah): A red flamingo with long legs is
permitted; if it has short legs, it is forbidden.
Next daf
|